Knowledge Center Catalog

Local cover image
Local cover image

Comparison of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) performance developed through conventional pedigree and doubled haploid breeding methods

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleLanguage: English Publication details: United Kingdom : John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2025.ISSN:
  • 0179-9541
  • 1439-0523 (Online)
Subject(s): In: Plant Breeding United Kingdom : y John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2025. In pressSummary: Pedigree breeding and doubled haploid (DH) methods are the two widely used breeding approaches in maize by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) to derive fixed inbred lines. The objective of this study was to compare the variability and performance of testcross hybrids developed through pedigree and DH breeding methods from two breeding crosses. From each breeding cross, 40-45 fixed lines developed via pedigree and DH methods were used. The lines were crossed with a single cross tester from a complementary heterotic group, and the resulting testcrosses alongside the commercial checks were evaluated under optimum and stress conditions in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. The means and homogeneity of variances of grain yield and agronomic traits of the pedigree and DH lines were compared by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We found that the DH lines were distributed in the same manner as the pedigree lines for all traits under stress and optimum conditions. Both methods produced hybrids that were higher grain yielding than the best commercial checks included in the trials. Although the pedigree method had more opportunity for recombination than the DH method, our results indicated that it did not produce a sample of recombinants that differed significantly from the DH lines; thus, both methods were equally efficient for use in deriving homozygous lines from F1 hybrids. Both pedigree selection and DH breeding methods have their particular strengths and weaknesses, but neither is superior nor inferior in the development of inbred lines. However, the adoption of the DH method is increasing in large commercial maize breeding programmes due to faster production of genetically homozygous lines than the pedigree method.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Status
Article CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library CIMMYT Staff Publications Collection Available
Total holds: 0

Peer review

Pedigree breeding and doubled haploid (DH) methods are the two widely used breeding approaches in maize by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) to derive fixed inbred lines. The objective of this study was to compare the variability and performance of testcross hybrids developed through pedigree and DH breeding methods from two breeding crosses. From each breeding cross, 40-45 fixed lines developed via pedigree and DH methods were used. The lines were crossed with a single cross tester from a complementary heterotic group, and the resulting testcrosses alongside the commercial checks were evaluated under optimum and stress conditions in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. The means and homogeneity of variances of grain yield and agronomic traits of the pedigree and DH lines were compared by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We found that the DH lines were distributed in the same manner as the pedigree lines for all traits under stress and optimum conditions. Both methods produced hybrids that were higher grain yielding than the best commercial checks included in the trials. Although the pedigree method had more opportunity for recombination than the DH method, our results indicated that it did not produce a sample of recombinants that differed significantly from the DH lines; thus, both methods were equally efficient for use in deriving homozygous lines from F1 hybrids. Both pedigree selection and DH breeding methods have their particular strengths and weaknesses, but neither is superior nor inferior in the development of inbred lines. However, the adoption of the DH method is increasing in large commercial maize breeding programmes due to faster production of genetically homozygous lines than the pedigree method.

Text in English

Aleri, I. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

Chavangi, A. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) Foundation for Food & Agriculture Research (FFAR) United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Accelerating Genetic Gains in Maize and Wheat (AGG) CGIAR Research Program on Maize (MAIZE) Climate adaptation & mitigation Nutrition, health & food security Accelerated Breeding Breeding Resources Genetic Innovation Breeding for Tomorrow

https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178122

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2021.
Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
If you have any question, please contact us at
CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org