Does adoption of improved maize varieties reduce poverty? evidence from Kenya
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Gold Coast (Australia) : International Association of Agricultural Economists, 2006Description: 15 pagesSubject(s): In: Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economics; Gold Coast (Australia); 12-18 Ago 2006Summary: Poverty in Kenya has worsened consistently over the past two decades, despite the antipoverty measures by the government and international development agencies. Currently, over 60% of the Kenyan population is estimated to be below the poverty line, with the majority of the poor residing in rural areas, where agriculture is the main source of livelihood. Lack of progress in poverty reduction is partly due to inadequate implementation of previous anti-poverty measures and partly because the measures paid insufficient attention to the development of agriculture, the backbone of the Kenyan economy. In particular, transfer of new technologies to farmers may have suffered due to under-financing of the national agricultural extension system (Bindlish and Evenson, 1997). Low agricultural productivity and poor marketing of farm produce are some of the causes of rural poverty. Low productivity is attributed to the use of traditional farming methods, poor soil fertility, unpredictable weather, high costs of inputs, poor quality of seed and lack of credit facilities. These multiple setbacks have led to food shortages, underdevelopment of farms, low farm incomes, and poor nutritional status, especially among children, increasing further the population’s vulnerability to poverty in the future.Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conference proceedings | CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library | CIMMYT Staff Publications Collection | CIS-5439 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 637997 |
Poverty in Kenya has worsened consistently over the past two decades, despite the antipoverty measures by the government and international development agencies. Currently, over 60% of the Kenyan population is estimated to be below the poverty line, with the majority of the poor residing in rural areas, where agriculture is the main source of livelihood. Lack of progress in poverty reduction is partly due to inadequate implementation of previous anti-poverty measures and partly because the measures paid insufficient attention to the development of agriculture, the backbone of the Kenyan economy. In particular, transfer of new technologies to farmers may have suffered due to under-financing of the national agricultural extension system (Bindlish and Evenson, 1997). Low agricultural productivity and poor marketing of farm produce are some of the causes of rural poverty. Low productivity is attributed to the use of traditional farming methods, poor soil fertility, unpredictable weather, high costs of inputs, poor quality of seed and lack of credit facilities. These multiple setbacks have led to food shortages, underdevelopment of farms, low farm incomes, and poor nutritional status, especially among children, increasing further the population’s vulnerability to poverty in the future.
Global Maize Program
Text in English
0902|Berta
INT1320
CIMMYT Staff Publications Collection