000 | 03121naa a22003617a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | G94574 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20230704220139.0 | ||
008 | 220708s2010 mx ||||| |||| 10| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a978-979-1159-41-8 | ||
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
090 | _aCIS-6140 | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKatuwal, R.B. _924785 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aVerification and validation of intercrops in double plants maize per hill system in the eastern middle hills of Nepal |
260 |
_aMexico, DF (Mexico) : _bCIMMYT, _c2010. |
||
520 | _aA set of experiments were conducted for the verification and validation of system based technology in order to increase the productivity and householdssystem of the mid hills (1100-1600 m) in the eastern Nepal during 2003-2006. Two independent research activities were executed including soyabean and ginger intercrops under double plants maize per hill (100x50 cm) system (DPS). Along with biological data, feedbacks from farmers were also collected. Yield data revealed significant differences of maize spacing (P<0.05) and soyabean varieties (P<0.01). The yield in DPS of maize was higher (4334 kg/ha) and the performance of soyabean varieties Seti and Chaing Maw 60-63 was better under the same system. The combined analysis of ginger (rhizome) yield over locations showed a significant difference (P<0.05), however interaction with locations and treatments were non-significant. Sole ginger followed by ginger planted under maize DPS yielded higher in both the years. Maize yield was at par and/or better among the treatments. The combined analysis for the years (2004 & 2006) showed the highest yield from DPS (maize+ginger) (17.0 & 23.4 t/ha) followed by sole cropping ginger (15.1 & 18.6 t/ha) respectively. The economic analysis for the years 2004 and 2006 revealed the highest profit from DPS of maize+ginger was Rs.86250/ha (US$ 1224)& Rs. 80942/ha (US$ 1156) followed by sole ginger Rs.78500/ha (US$ 1114) & Rs. 53656/ha(US$ 767) respectively while compared with sole maize (Rs.158/ ha or US$ 2.2/ha) which wasn maize performed better without lowering the maize yield. Similarly, on-farm income can be easily increased with the intervention of ginger in the maize-based system. | ||
536 | _aConservation Agriculture Program | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
594 | _aINT3018 | ||
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _96135 _aIntercropping |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91068 _aCropping systems |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91173 _aMaize |
|
651 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _93932 _aNepal |
|
700 | 1 |
_aAdhikari, N.P. _928085 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aTimsina, G.P. _928086 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aVista, S.P. _928087 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aTiwari, T.P. _gSustainable Intensification Program _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT3018 _9881 |
|
700 |
_aOrtiz-Ferrara, G. _96742 |
||
711 | _4Proceedings of the Asian Regional Maize Workshop, 10; Makassar (Indonesia); 20-23 Oct 2008 | ||
773 | 0 |
_dMexico : CIMMYT, 2010. _gp. 508-513 _tAsian Regional Maize Workshop, 10. Maize for Asia - Emerging Trends and Technologies; Proceedings of The Asian Regional Maize Workshop; Makassar (Indonesia); 20-23 Oct. 2008 _wG94189 _z978-979-1159-41-8 |
|
942 |
_cBP _2ddc _n0 |
||
999 |
_c7993 _d7993 |