000 | 03430nam a22003377a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | G93651 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20230704201320.0 | ||
008 | 121211s2009||||cc | ||0|| | e eneng d | ||
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
090 | _aCIS-5787 | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMagorokosho, C. _gFormerly Global Maize Program _8INT2714 _9854 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aGenetic diversity and agronomic performance of southern african maize varieties under abiotic stresses |
260 |
_aShangai, China : _bSAGC, _c2009. |
||
300 | _a1 page | ||
500 | _aPoster Abstract | ||
500 | _aPresented at International Conference on Integrated Approaches to Improve Crop production Under Drougt-Prone Environments (INTERDROUGHT), 3; Shangai, China, 11-16 Oct, 2009 | ||
520 | _aLarge scale and planned introduction of maize (Zea mays L.) in southern Africa was accomplished during the last 100 years. Since then, smallholder farmers and breeders have been selecting varieties best adapted to their specific growing conditions and market needs. A study was conducted in 2004 and 2005 to assess the variability and performance of a core set of maize varieties collected in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi. A total of 108 varieties comprising ancestral open pollinated varieties (OPV) introductions originating from the USA, early generation OPVs developed in southern Africa around the 1900s, traditional landraces and improved varieties were evaluated under low soil nitrogen, low soil pH, drought stress, random stress, and under optimum moisture and fertilizer levels. Results obtained showed the existence of considerable variation in agronomic traits under the different environments. Differences among the accessions, type of accessions (landraces, ancestors, early OPVs and improved) were significant for most of the traits studied. Genotype x Environment (GxE) interactions were also significant. Agronomic performance of maize varieties under different environments was used to create dendrograms, where materials were clustered into groups based on respective performance under specific environments. Estimates of broad sense heritabilities varied depending on traits and testing environments. However, these estimates were generally larger for each trait in the environment where the variance of that trait was highest. Genetic and phenotypic correlation coefficients also varied depending on traits and testing environments. Biplots constructed revealed which traits were closely related for each environment. Generally improved varieties outperformed landraces under all environments, but there were notable exceptions with many landraces yielding as much as improved varieties. Landraces were more stable than improved varieties across test environments, but improved varieties were more responsive to favorable growing conditions. The most promising landraces for pre-breeding and further investigation were identified. | ||
536 | _aGlobal Maize Program|Research and Partnership Program | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
594 | _aINT1888|INT2714 | ||
595 | _aCSC | ||
650 | 7 |
_91130 _aGenetics _2AGROVOC |
|
650 | 7 |
_aMaize _2AGROVOC _91173 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aVarieties _2AGROVOC _91303 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBanziger, M. _gResearch & Partnership Program _gExcellence in Breeding _8INT1888 _9834 |
|
700 | 1 |
_96537 _aBetrĂ¡n, J. |
|
856 | 4 |
_uhttp://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/Download/cis/G93651.pdf _yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff |
|
942 |
_cPOS _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c7821 _d7821 |