000 02923nam a22004457a 4500
001 G81247
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20211006084800.0
008 121211s ||||f| 0 p|p||0|| |
020 _a970-648-116-8
040 _aMX-TxCIM
072 0 _aE16
072 0 _aF01
090 _aLook under series title
100 1 _aArachchi, D.H.M.
_uAsian Regional Maize Workshop, 8: New Technologies for the New Millennium
110 0 _aCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT), Mexico, DF (Mexico)
111 2 _aProceedings of the Asian Regional Maize Workshop
_cBangkok (Thailand)
_d5-8 Aug 2002
245 0 0 _aPerformance of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes during post-germination drought
260 _aMexico, DF (Mexico)
_bCIMMYT :
_c2004
300 _ap. 427-440
340 _aPrinted
520 _aMaize crop establishment is often drought - impaired. A 7 - 10 day dry spell after germination is common. Experiments were designed to mimic this situation to determine if germination ability at low water potential could be used as a criterion to select for ability to sustain post germination growth. The four cultivars used had differences in their germination ability at low water potential. One, the improved variety pool 26, is known to be drought tolerant. Many of the adjustments in plant growth to water stress were typical of those reported for maize; there were no significant differences between indigenous and improved varieties. Decline of seedling height increase begins 2 to 3 days after stress. Leaf area was the most affected parameter; withholding water significantly increased the root: shoot ratio and decreased leaf area: root length ratio. The pool 26 showed a distinct response. Nodal root length significantly differed confirming the fact that many tropical maize cultivars have more nodal roots which absorb moisture from the top soil layer by altering the osmotic adjustment during drought compared to seminals and laterals. The total root length differed significantly between watered and un-watered plants. Results indicate several significant changes between watered and un-watered plants but the differences between cultivars in germination ability at low water potential did not reflect their relative tolerance to the drought situation
546 _aEnglish
591 _a0502|AGRIS 0501|AL-Maize Program
593 _aJuan Carlos Mendieta
595 _aCPC
650 1 7 _aCrop yield
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91066
650 1 0 _aDrought resistance
650 1 0 _aFood production
_91116
650 1 0 _aGermination
650 1 7 _aMaize
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91173
650 1 0 _aWater potential
653 0 _aCIMMYT
650 1 0 _91314
_aZea mays
_gAGROVOC
650 1 0 _91134
_aGenotypes
_gAGROVOC
700 1 _aBingham, I.J.,
_ecoaut.
700 1 _aNaylor, R.E.L.,
_ecoaut.
700 1 _aSrinivasan, G.|Zaidi, P.H.|Prasanna, B.M.|Gonzalez, F.|Lesnick, K.
_eeds.
942 _cPRO
999 _c7478
_d7478