000 03079nam a22004937a 4500
001 G80771
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20211006084757.0
008 121211s ||||f| 0 p|p||0|| |
020 _a970-648-120-6
040 _aMX-TxCIM
072 0 _aE16
072 0 _aH60
082 0 4 _a338.16
_bFRI
100 1 _aGatsi, T.
_uIntegrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium
110 0 _aCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT) Kenya
111 2 _a7. Proceedings of the Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference
_cNairobi (Kenya)
_d5-11 Feb 2002
245 0 0 _aEconomics of integrated tillage and weed control parctices on maize-based systems in the smallholder farming sector of Zimbabwe
260 _aNairobi (Kenya)
_bKARI|CIMMYT :
_c2002
300 _ap. 491-494
340 _aPrinted
520 _aSmallholder farmers in Zimbabwe rely heavily on draught animal power and ox-drawn mouldboard ploughs for primary tillage and crop establishment. Reduced tillage studies in the past have proved that it is a viable option, which ensures early planting and has less draught animal power demand. Work conducted in two communal areas of Zimbabwe (Chihota, and Tsholotsho) showed that labour can be significantly reduced by the use of half the recommended rates of atrazine (herbicide used in maize) either banded (applying herbicide close to the maize) or full cover. The objective of this paper is to analyse the profitability of tillage and weed control practices in smallholder farms. Using two seasons' data, gross margin analysis showed there were higher returns to cash expenditure ranging from 1.08 to about 2.65 per dollar invested for the reduced tillage and banded atrazine treatments in the three sites. In Tsholotsho, which is a drier area, reduced tillage and either mechanical or use of atrazine banded was more profitable with returns to cash expenditure of Z$2.79 and Z$ 2.65 per Z$ invested, respectively. In Chihota, a relatively wetter area, reduced tillage and banding atrazine in combination with mechanical weeding was more profitable with returns of Z$ 2.05 and Z$ 1.97, respectively. It might be worthwhile for farmers in the two areas to use reduced tillage with mechanical, atrazine or manual weeding depending on their resources.
546 _aEnglish
591 _a0410|AGRIS 0401|AL-Maize Program
593 _aJuan Carlos Mendieta
595 _aCPC
650 1 0 _aAgricultural economics
650 1 7 _aCropping systems
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91068
650 1 0 _aFarmers
_gAGROVOC
_91654
650 1 7 _aMaize
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91173
650 1 0 _aSeed production
_91253
650 1 7 _aSmall farms
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91260
650 1 7 _aWeed control
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91308
650 1 0 _aZimbabwe
653 0 _aCIMMYT
653 0 _aKARI
650 1 0 _91832
_aTillage
_gAGROVOC
650 1 0 _91109
_aFarming systems
_gAGROVOC
700 1 _aFriesen, D.K.|Palmer, A.F.E.
_eeds.
700 1 _aKanyungwe, K.,
_ecoaut.
700 1 _aMabasa, S.,
_ecoaut.
700 1 _aMakanganise, A.,
_ecoaut.
942 _cBK
999 _c7415
_d7415