| 000 | 03134nam a22003617a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69839 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20260126111328.0 | ||
| 008 | 260126s2026 bg ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aNandi, R. _8001713797 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _932843 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAdvancing climate adaptation and mitigation in Bangladesh : _bStrengthening policy, institutions, and finance for resilient development |
| 260 |
_a[Bangladesh] : _bCIMMYT, _c2026. |
||
| 300 | _a69 pages | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aBangladesh is among the most climate-vulnerable countries in the world due to its low-lying deltaic geography, dense population, and heavy reliance on agriculture. Despite contributing less than 0.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, the country faces severe threats from rising sea levels, salinity intrusion, cyclones, floods, excessive temperature, and droughts. These risks jeopardize food security, livelihoods, and economic growth. Over the past two decades, Bangladesh has developed an extensive policy architecture to address these challenges. Key frameworks include the National Adaptation Plan (NAP 2023–2050), Mujib Climate Prosperity Plan (MCPP 2022–2041), Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP), and the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100 (BDP2100), National Determined Contribution (NDC). Together, they provide strategic direction for adaptation, resilience-building, and a gradual shift towards low-carbon development. In FY 2025–26, about BDT 42,206.89 crore (≈10.09% f the national budget, 0.75% of GDP) was allocated to climate-related spending across 25 ministries, reflecting progress in mainstreaming climate priorities into national planning. The inventory conducted for this study identified 58 active national initiatives (Policies, strategic plans, actions plan, programs and projects) directly related to climate adaptation and mitigation. The analysis revealed a strong emphasis on adaptation, particularly disaster risk reduction, agriculture resilience, and community-based interventions. Mitigation, while increasingly recognized, remains underfunded and less embedded in programmatic implementation, especially in renewable energy and low-carbon transitions. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aSumona Shahrin : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 591 | _aWais Kabir : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 597 |
_fScaling for Impact _dCGIAR Trust Fund _dAustralian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aClimate change adaptation _95511 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aMitigation _926191 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aPolicies _94809 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aState intervention _99119 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aFinancing _96258 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aBangladesh _2AGROVOC _91424 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aSumona Shahrin _93696 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aWais Kabir _930825 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKrupnik, T.J. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3222 _9906 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/36832 |
|
| 942 |
_cRE _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69839 _d69831 |
||