| 000 | 03408nam a22003617a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69803 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20260121161414.0 | ||
| 008 | 260119s2025 rh ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aZingwena, T. _932518 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aGender and power in land use choices in agrobiodiversity conservation : _bLessons from the multifunctional landscapes of Mbire District, Zimbabwe |
| 260 |
_a[Zimbabwe] : _bCIMMYT : _bCGIAR, _c2025. |
||
| 300 | _a20 pages | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aGendered power relations critically shape land-use choices, labour allocation, and agrobiodiversity outcomes in smallholder farming systems, yet they remain underexamined in landscape-level interventions. This paper analyses how intra-household gender dynamics influence participation, decision-making authority, and access to resources in agrobiodiversity conservation within the multifunctional landscapes of Mbire District, Zimbabwe. Using a qualitative research design, the study draws on gender-segregated focus group discussions with 49 participants across two wards, followed by a joint deliberative dialogue. Analysis is guided by the TASSFA framework (Tasks, Authority, Spaces, Skills, Frequencies, and Access) to systematically examine gendered roles, constraints, and power relations embedded in everyday land-use practices. The findings reveal a persistent disconnect between labour contributions and decision-making power. Women perform a substantial share of productive and reproductive labour related to agrobiodiversity management, yet men retain dominant authority over strategic decisions, land control, and benefit allocation. Although households frequently describe decision-making as “joint,” closer analysis shows that jointness often reflects consultation rather than equal authority. Gendered exclusions are reinforced through restricted access to decision spaces, unequal recognition of skills, time poverty, and limited access to markets and assets. The study suggests that effective and equitable landscape interventions must move beyond participation to explicitly address power, authority, and access, positioning TASSFA as a valuable tool for gender-transformative multifunctional landscape governance. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aZingwena, T. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 591 | _aManyanga, M. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 597 |
_fMultifunctional Landscapes _aClimate adaptation & mitigation _aEnvironmental health & biodiversity _aGender equality, youth & social inclusion _aNutrition, health & food security _aPoverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs _cSystems Transformation _cResilient Agrifood Systems _dCGIAR Trust Fund _bAgroecology _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/180348 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aGender _2AGROVOC _91123 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLand Use _2AGROVOC _99018 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aAgrobiodiversity _2AGROVOC _98725 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aDecision making _2AGROVOC _98770 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aIntrahousehold relations _2AGROVOC _941121 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aZimbabwe _2AGROVOC _94496 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aManyanga, M. _930689 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_8001710897 _aOdjo, S. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _914751 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aChimonyo, V.G.P. _8001712688 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _919177 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/36774 |
|
| 942 |
_cRE _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69803 _d69795 |
||