| 000 | 02951nab|a22003737a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69605 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251203124006.0 | ||
| 008 | 251125s2025 ne |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a1573-2975 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06369-z | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 0 |
_aAmadu Yaya Kamara _933579 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aClimate-resilient crop varieties, productivity and household welfare : _bevidence from Nigeria |
| 260 |
_aNetherlands : _bSpringer, _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aClimate shocks pose significant threats to socioeconomic development, especially in agrarian areas where farmers, particularly women, are highly vulnerable to the negative consequences of climate variability. Women in these regions often face greater challenges due to limited access to resources, information, and agricultural inputs, which can exacerbate the impacts of climate change on their productivity and welfare. In response to these challenges, climate-resilient improved crop varieties have been disseminated to farmers over the years in a specific region in Nigeria. However, the productivity and welfare impact of these varieties, particularly in relation to gender differential outcomes, remains an empirical question. This paper examines the drivers and impacts of the adoption of climate-resilient cowpea varieties (CRCVs), with a focus on gender, using endogenous and exogenous switching regression models. Results show that the adoption rate of climate-resilient cowpea varieties is about 58% in the study area. Among other factors, the education of farmers and agricultural extension services strongly explain the adoption of these varieties. Notably, the adoption of CRCVs significantly increased yield, food expenditure, and non-food expenditure among adopters. While there is a slightly higher adoption rate among male-headed households, the results indicate no substantial gender differences in yield, food expenditure, and non-food expenditure between male- and female-headed households that can be attributed to returns or level effects. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 597 |
_aNutrition, health & food security _bExcellence in Agronomy _cGenetic Innovation _dBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/178501 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aInnovation adoption _2AGROVOC _91160 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aClimate change _2AGROVOC _91045 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aExpenditure _2AGROVOC _913850 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aCowpeas _2AGROVOC _95144 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aGender _2AGROVOC _91123 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aYields _2AGROVOC _91313 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aNigeria _2AGROVOC _94370 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aOyakhilomen Oyinbo _8001712444 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _98728 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aOluwole, T.S. _938330 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aJajua, M. _940697 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKamai, N. _96832 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tEnvironment, Development and Sustainability _dNetherlands : Springer, 2025. _x1387-585X _gIn press _wG91685 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69605 _d69597 |
||