| 000 | 04068nab|a22003857a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69586 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251203110744.0 | ||
| 008 | 251124s2025 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0048-9697 | ||
| 022 | _a1879-1026 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179963 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aParambil-Peedika, A. _939628 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAgroecological impacts of crop residue burning : _ba qualitative systematic review of direct and inferred evidence |
| 260 |
_aAmsterdam (Netherlands) : _bElsevier, _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aThe widespread adoption of mechanized crop harvesting in cereal-based production systems and limited turnaround time between cropping seasons have made crop residue burning a prevalent time-saving practice. Despite its well-documented environmental and health consequences, how residue burning affects agrobiodiversity and ecosystem functions remains underexplored. This qualitative systematic review includes a total of 250 peer-reviewed studies, of which 41 examined the direct effects of residue burning, and 209 focused on broader air pollution impacts as inferential evidence, of which 134 publications focused on arthropods and 75 on birds. From the 233 recorded trait instances across the studied species, about 40 % showed a negative response to residue burning, indicating improved biodiversity responses to alternative residue management practices, such as retention, incorporation, and manual or mechanical removal. Residue burning negatively affected natural predators but favored parasitic nematodes and rodent pests. More studies are required to better characterize the functional responses of important species across various agroecosystems. The decline in soil biodiversity and beneficial species due to residue burning significantly diminishes the ecosystem services these biodiversity components provide, ultimately threatening long-term system productivity. Arthropods and birds, which play critical ecological roles in agroecosystems, may also be adversely affected by residue burning. However, very few air pollution studies have explicitly examined the impact of residue burning on higher taxa. Findings from broader air pollution studies, used here as secondary evidence, offer valuable inferential insights into the potential ecological impacts of crop residue burning on birds and arthropods, mediated through changes in air quality. Despite these documented consequences, agrobiodiversity considerations are largely absent from policy discussions on residue management. Our findings highlight the urgent need for a comprehensive assessment of the ecological impacts of crop residue burning on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services to inform biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation efforts to ensure sustainability of agricultural systems. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 597 |
_aClimate adaptation & mitigation _aEnvironmental health & biodiversity _bMixed Farming Systems _cSystems Transformation _cResilient Agrifood Systems _dIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) _dCGIAR Trust Fund _fSustainable Farming _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/178493 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aCrop residues _2AGROVOC _91064 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aControlled burning _2AGROVOC _910269 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aAgrobiodiversity _2AGROVOC _98725 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aAir pollution _2AGROVOC _97239 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aCrop residue management _2AGROVOC _931822 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aBirds _2AGROVOC _918778 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aArthropods _2AGROVOC _938953 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aLaing, A.M. _8001713882 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _94042 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aGathala, M.K. _gSustainable Intensification Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3262 _9911 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAdeeth AG Cariappa _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8001713705 _931156 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKrishna, V.V. _8INT2994 _gSocioeconomics Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _9558 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tScience of the Total Environment _gv. 994, art. 179963 _dAmsterdam (Netherlands) : Elsevier, 2025. _x0048-9697 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69586 _d69578 |
||