| 000 | 03253nab|a22004457a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69555 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251123184003.0 | ||
| 008 | 251120s2025 xxk||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2168-3565 | ||
| 022 | _a2168-3573 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2025.2556433 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aElDidi, H. _940569 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMulti-stakeholder platforms for enabling agroecological transitions _bconfigurations and lessons from seven agroecological living landscapes |
| 260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bTaylor and Francis, _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aAgroecological transition (AET) of agrifood systems is a multidimensional process involving diverse stakeholders. Participatory innovation and co-creation of knowledge are also at the heart of agroecology. Deliberately designed Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) are collaborative spaces conducive to driving this type of collaboration and change. However, how these processes are operationalized is poorly documented. This study contributes to filling this gap by highlighting how MSPs can be important vehicles for enabling AETs. As part of the CGIAR Initiative on Agroecology, Agroecological Living Landscapes (ALLs) were set up as MSPs specifically focusing on co-creation of agroecological innovations. By examining different ALL configurations in seven countries, we analyze MSP attributes that can enable and shape AETs at different stages or “levels” of the transition pathway. We find that MSPs can advance different levels of the transition pathway simultaneously by working on multiple innovations involving various stakeholder coalitions. MSPs navigate complex environments, with diverse stakeholders playing multiple policy and non-policy roles to support AETs. The results also illustrate the intersection between MSP configuration and AET objectives, such as policy change, agroecology market support, and scaling adoption. Finally, we discuss the non-linear nature of AET pathways and political economy considerations for stakeholder engagement in MSPs. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 597 |
_aClimate adaptation & mitigation _aEnvironmental health & biodiversity _aGender equality, youth & social inclusion _aPoverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs _bAgroecology _cSystems Transformation _cResilient Agrifood Systems _dCGIAR Trust Fund _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/176518 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aAgroecology _2AGROVOC _93995 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aMulti-stakeholder processes _2AGROVOC _921688 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aInnovation _2AGROVOC _94423 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aAfrica South of Sahara _2AGROVOC _91950 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aLatin America _2AGROVOC _93843 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aNorth Africa _2AGROVOC _94695 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aSouth Asia _2AGROVOC _91956 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aNavarrete, A. _940570 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPiraux, M. _940571 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aVall, E. _940572 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aTristán, M.C. _940573 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aChimonyo, V.G.P. _8001712688 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _919177 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aFuchs, L.E. _940574 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSingh, S. _939012 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aFrija, A. _98304 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systems _dUnited Kingdom : Taylor and Francis, 2025. _x2168-3565 _gIn press |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69555 _d69547 |
||