000			04277nab|a22004217a|4500
001			69438
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20251222155608.0
008			202512s2025||||ne |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022			_a0378-4290
022			_a1872-6852 (Online)
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110172
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_8001712305 _aKarwat, H. _gGlobal Wheat Program _917182
245	1	0	_aNitrogen dynamics and yield performance of an elite bread wheat line with BNI capacity expressed in an alkaline soil
260			_aNetherlands : _bElsevier B.V., _c2025.
500			_aPeer review
520			_aWheat with biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) has demonstrated effectiveness in acidic soils. However, BNI expression under alkaline soil conditions have not been documented in field studies. Here, we present the first field-based evidence of BNI effects in alkaline soils (pH 8.6-8.7), using an elite spring wheat line (ROELFS) carrying the Lr#N short arm (+BNI) introgressed from Leymus racemosus which confers BNI activity as compared to ROELFS without the translocation arm (-BNI). BNI expression was evidenced by lower soil nitrate in three irrigated wheat trials conducted in northwestern Mexico. In one trial (Exp 1), soil nitrate levels of the translocation line (+BNI) were 24-37 % lower than in the control line (-BNI) after the second application of ammonium-N fertilizer. Reductions were observed both in the row and in the furrow. In another trial (Exp 3), the most pronounced nitrate difference occurred approximately one month after the second ammonium-N application, with nitrate levels in +BNI plots reduced by 73-77 %. The translocation line also exhibited higher flag leaf nitrate concentrations, likely associated with the decreased soil nitrate concentrations. In vitro potential nitrification rates, measured one week after ammonium-N application, were 27-32 % lower in soil associated with the +BNI line compared to the control, across two consecutive years. Phenologically, the +BNI line reached anthesis and flowering later than the control, regardless of additional N fertilization. In two experiments, grain yield did not differ significantly between +BNI and control, while in one trial it was reduced, due to fewer grains per spike and a lower spike density. The harvest index was consistently lower in +BNI than -BNI under high N input. Nevertheless, grain protein and grain N uptake and grain weight were not statistically different between the lines. We conclude that BNI can significantly reduce nitrification with a spatially and temporally impact under alkaline, high N conditions. This represents a potentially important environmental benefit for a wide range of wheat systems globally. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of the Lr#N short arm on yield and quality in other elite lines. Additionally, potential negative effects on gluten quality from the wild donor genome should be considered in future breeding efforts.
546			_aText in English
591			_aCárdenas-Castañeda, M.E. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation
597			_dMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF) _dAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) _dCGIAR Research Program on Wheat (WHEAT) _dNovo Nordisk Foundation (NNF) _fBreeding for Tomorrow _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/179210
650		7	_aNitrification inhibitors _2AGROVOC _94939
650		7	_aSpring wheat _2AGROVOC _91806
650		7	_aAlkaline soils _2AGROVOC _912125
650		7	_aNitrogen fertilizers _2AGROVOC _91190
650		7	_aWheat _2AGROVOC _91310
700	1		_aKishii, M. _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT2678 _9849
700	1		_aCárdenas-Castañeda, M.E. _940405
700	1		_a Ibba, M.I. _8001711897 _gGlobal Wheat Program _95836
700	1		_aKommerell, V. _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT3509 _9964
700	1		_aBentley, A.R. _8001712492 _gFormerly Global Wheat Program _99599
700	1		_aBraun, H.J. _gFormerly Global Wheat Program _8INT0599 _9824
700	1		_aOrtiz-Monasterio, I. _gFormerly Sustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT1421 _9827
773	0		_tField Crops Research _gv. 334, art. 110172 _dNetherlands : Elsevier B.V., 2025 _x0378-4290 _wG444314
942			_cJA _n0 _2ddc
999			_c69438 _d69430