| 000 | 03650nab|a22005057a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69375 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251001143204.0 | ||
| 008 | 2509292025|||||ne ||p|op||||00||0|eng|dd | ||
| 022 | _a0378-3774 | ||
| 022 | _a1873-2283 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109830 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_8001712974 _aMkondiwa, M. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _926831 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aFarmers agronomic management responses to extreme drought and rice yields in Bihar, India |
| 260 |
_aAmsterdam (Netherlands) : _bElsevier B.V., _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aIn 2022, the Indian state of Bihar experienced its sixth driest year in over a century. To document the consequences and farmer responses to the meteorological drought, real-time survey data was collected across 11 districts of Bihar. We then developed a causal machine learning model to quantify drought impacts on rice production and to characterize how access to affordable irrigation from electric pumps mitigated productivity losses. This model addresses the empirical challenge of conducting a counterfactual causal analysis when a factor like drought affects nearly all sampled farmers. In the 2022 event, drought led to rice acreage reduction, transplanting delays, damage to seedling nurseries, and higher use rates of supplemental irrigation. For fields that were planted, average yield losses from water stress were estimated as 0.94 t/ha (∼23 % yield loss) with these losses reduced by 0.3 t/ha in fields with access to electric tubewells. Agronomic management practices such as earlier transplanting were also identified as complementary strategies that increased the adaptation value of investments in irrigation. To reduce the impact of drought in Bihar, additional investments in electric irrigation infrastructure are needed along with focused extension efforts and decision support systems that empower farmers to make economically and sustainably rational use of available water resources to maintain yield and profitability. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aSaxena, S. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 591 | _aMcDonald, A. : No CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 597 |
_bExcellence in Agronomy _aClimate adaptation & mitigation _aPoverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs _cResilient Agrifood Systems _dBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/176664 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aIrrigation _2AGROVOC _91164 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMachine learning _2AGROVOC _911127 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aCrops _2AGROVOC _91069 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aDrought _2AGROVOC _91080 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aRice _2AGROVOC _91243 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aIndia _2AGROVOC _93726 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKishore, A. _910920 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aPrakashan Chellattan Veetil _940181 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSherpa, S.R. _8001712516 _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _928790 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSaxena, S. _940182 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPinjarla, B. _940183 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aUrfels, A. _8001711637 _gFormerly Sustainable Agrifood Systems _94925 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPoonia, S.P. _gSustainable Intensification Program _96359 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAnurag Ajay _92767 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aCraufurd, P. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8I1705950 _9792 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMalik, R. _gSustainable Intensification Program _8R1705430 _9972 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMcDonald, A. _gSustainable Intensification Program _8INT3034 _9883 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tAgricultural Water Management _gv. 320, art. 109830 _dAmsterdam (Netherlands) : Elsevier B.V., 2025. _x0378-3774 _w444468 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/35898 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69375 _d69367 |
||