| 000 | 03359nab|a22003977a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 69362 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251201113030.0 | ||
| 008 | 20259s2025|||||-uk||p|op||||00||0|eng|dd | ||
| 022 | _a1364-985X | ||
| 022 | _a467-8489 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70050 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPaudel, G.P. _8R1705561 _gSustainable Intensification Program _91353 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aProductivity and welfare impacts of sustainable intensification in rice-wheat crop rotations : _bEvidence from the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains |
| 260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bJohn Wiley & Sons Australia, _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aSustainable intensification (SI) has been receiving policy attention for its potential to transform agri-food systems and improve rural livelihoods. However, little is known about how SI technology bundles influence system productivity, profitability and household welfare in the coupled rice-wheat crop rotations of the Indo-Gangetic Plains in South Asia. We investigate the combined impacts of direct seeded rice (mDSR) and zero-tillage (ZT) wheat on system productivity, profitability and household welfare in the rice-wheat system of Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Using a multinomial endogenous switching regression model to address selection bias, we find that the joint adoption of mDSR and ZT wheat significantly improves cropping system productivity by 19% (1148 kg per hectare), reduces production costs by 18% (US$ 159 per hectare), increases farm profits by 84% (US$ 502 per hectare) and raises household per capita income by 56%. However, these benefits are unevenly distributed, with poorer farms benefitting less from rice-wheat farming and more from off-farm income compared to richer farms. Our findings underscore the need for policy support to promote broader SI adoption and emphasise the importance of fostering off-farm jobs for equitable development. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 597 |
_dCereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) _dUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID) _dBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) _dAcademy for International Agricultural Research (ACINAR) _dFederal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) _dGerman Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) _aClimate adaptation & mitigation _aEnvironmental health & biodiversity _aPoverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs _bExcellence in Agronomy _cSystems Transformation _cResilient Agrifood Systems _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/178395 |
||
| 650 | 7 |
_aRice _2AGROVOC _91243 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aProfitability _2AGROVOC _98416 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aSustainable intensification _2AGROVOC _91355 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aTechnology adoption _2AGROVOC _91287 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aZero tillage _2AGROVOC _91754 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aWheat _2AGROVOC _91310 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aSouth Asia _2AGROVOC _91956 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aChamberlin, J. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8I1706801 _92871 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aTrung Thanh Nguyen _918935 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics _dUnited Kingdom : John Wiley & Sons Australia, 2025. _gv. 69, no. 4, p. 892-910 _wG63847 _x1364-985X |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/35927 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c69362 _d69354 |
||