000			01960nab a22003137a 4500
001			68583
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20250129130448.0
008			250128s2024 -us||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2040-5790
022			_a2040-5804 (Online)
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13440
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_aFisher, M. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3350 _8001713678 _9931
245	1	3	_aIs union membership associated with higher wages of U.S. farmworkers? : _bAn empirical analysis using the national agricultural workers survey
260			_aUnited States of America : _bAgricultural & Applied Economics Association ; _bJohn Wiley & Sons, _c2024.
520			_aUsing National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) data, we examine which farmworkers are unionized and whether their status differs systematically from non-unionized farmworkers. Logit results indicate farmworkers are less likely to be unionized if they are Black, unauthorized to work in the U.S., less educated, have English proficiency, work for farm labor contractors (versus growers), and cultivate field (vs. horticulture) crops. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition reveals that union members earn $0.87 more in hourly wages, are 4.8% points more likely to receive a bonus, and are 15.6% points more likely to have employer-provided health insurance than comparable non-unionized farmworkers.
546			_aText in English
650		7	_aBargaining power _2AGROVOC _938131
650		7	_aLabour _2AGROVOC _96610
650		7	_aUnions _2AGROVOC _938132
650		7	_aRemuneration _2AGROVOC _914694
651		7	_aUnited States of America _2AGROVOC _94609
700	1		_aReimer, J.J. _938122
700	1		_aLewin, P.A. _925104
773	0		_dUnited States of America : Agricultural & Applied Economics Association ; John Wiley & Sons, 2024. _gv. 46, no. 3, p. 1175-1189 _tApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy _wG94298 _x2040-5790
942			_2ddc _cJA _n0
999			_c68583 _d68575