000			01989nab a22003737a 4500
001			68580
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20250129130428.0
008			250128s2023 -uk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a1087-5549
022			_a1540-7608 (Online)
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2023.2173116
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_aFisher, M. _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3350 _8001713678 _9931
245	1	0	_aWorking yet poor : _bA quantitative analysis for the United States
260			_aUnited Kingdom : _bTaylor & Francis, _c2024.
500			_aPeer review
520			_aThis study uses Current Population Survey data and econometric techniques to examine whether working poor households improve their economic wellbeing by working more hours. For working households overall, full-time work puts them in a 49–78% better position than part-time work (as measured by resources-to-need and depending on methodology). For poor families, however, full-time work makes them 1.3–2.7% better off than part-time work. The latter finding reflects that the higher earnings of full-time work come at considerable cost: lower public assistance benefits and higher medical, work, and childcare expenditures. We discuss policies that may reduce these tradeoffs for poor working households.
546			_aText in English
591			_aFisher, M. : Not CIMMYT Affiliation
650		7	_aQuantitative analysis _2AGROVOC _95912
650		7	_aPolicies _2AGROVOC _94809
650		7	_aPoverty reduction _2AGROVOC _927574
650		7	_aPropensity score matching _2AGROVOC _936156
650		7	_aLivelihoods _2AGROVOC _92558
651		7	_aUnited States of America _2AGROVOC _94609
700	1		_aReimer, J.J. _938122
700	1		_aLewin, P.A. _925104
700	1		_aWornell, E.J. _938119
700	1		_aWeber, B.A. _938123
773	0		_dUnited Kingdom : Taylor & Francis, 2024. _gv. 28, no. 3, p. 244–261 _tJournal of Poverty _x1087-5549
942			_2ddc _cJA _n0
999			_c68580 _d68572