000			02919nam a22004457a 4500
001			G77107
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20211006072329.0
008			121211s ||||f| 0 p|p||0|| |
020			_a970-648-076-5
040			_aMX-TxCIM
072		0	_aA50
072		0	_aE10
082	0	4	_a338.91 _bWAT
100	1		_aAdato, M. _uInternational conference on impacts of agricultural research and development: Why has impact assessment research not made more of a difference?
110	0		_aCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT), Mexico DF (Mexico)
111	2		_aInternational Conference on Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development _cSan José (Costa Rica) _d4-7 Feb 2002
245	0	0	_aAssessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty with the sustainable livelihoods framework: _b Concepts and methods
260			_aMexico, DF (Mexico) _bCIMMYT : _c2003
300			_ap. 49
340			_aPrinted
500			_aAbstract only
520			_aAs the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) goes beyond the goal of increasing food production to the broader goal of reducing poverty, both agricultural research and studies of its impact become more complex. The Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) has commissioned a multi-country study of the impact of agricultural research on poverty, led by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) with the participation of several other centers. The studies use an expanded definition of poverty that goes beyond income or nutrition-based head counts, to consider other aspects of well-being and empowerment. The Sustainable Livelihoods framework provides a common conceptual approach to examining the ways in which agricultural research and technologies fit into the livelihood strategies of households with different types of assets and wealth, and the types of outcomes for reducing poverty and vulnerability. Applying this framework requires interdisciplinary research and a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. This paper reports on the conceptual framework, methods, and findings to date of these studies. The first paper provides an overview of the approach, followed by more detailed methods and results from three of the case studies: two in Bangladesh and one in Mexico.
546			_aEnglish
591			_a0310|R01CIMPU|AGRIS 0301|AL-Economics Program
593			_aJuan Carlos Mendieta
595			_aCPC
650	1	0	_aCGIAR
650	1	0	_aDeveloping Countries
650	1	0	_aFood policies _91115
650	1	0	_aFood production _91116
650	1	7	_aPoverty _gAGROVOC _2 _91215
650	1	0	_aQuantitative analysis
650	1	0	_aTechnological changes
653	0		_aCIMMYT
650	1	7	_aAgricultural research _gAGROVOC _2 _91006
700	1		_aMeinzen Dick, R., _ecoaut.
700	1		_9960 _aWatson, D.J. _gResearch & Partnership Program _8INT3479 _eed.
942			_cPRO
999			_c6856 _d6856