| 000 | 03074nab|a22004337a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 68415 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20251113132144.0 | ||
| 008 | 20251ss2025|||mgw ||ppoop|||00||0|eengdd | ||
| 022 | _a0925-9864 | ||
| 022 | _a1573-5109 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02322-7 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 0 |
_aDev Nidhi Tiwari _938166 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aExploring diversity in aromatic rice landraces for physio-chemical, cooking and milling quality traits in Nepal |
| 260 |
_aGermany : _bSpringer Nature, _c2025. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aThe physico-chemical, nutritional, cooking, and milling properties of rice play a crucial role in shaping consumer preferences and market demand in Nepal. This study conducted a comprehensive investigation of the major rice quality parameters of 30 fine and aromatic rice landraces, collected from different regions of the country, as potential alternatives to imported improved rice cultivars. Statistical analysis revealed that the amylose content in Sunaulo Sugandha (25.6%) and Hiupuri (27.1%) was higher than that of the check cultivars (Kalanamak: 14.3% and Samba Masuli Sub-1: 18.2%). The rice landraces were comparable to the check cultivars in terms of kernel length to breadth ratio (3.4–3.6), which ranged from medium to long and slender. The milling and head rice recovery for Balamsari Dhan and Lalka Basmati exceeded 70%, while the check cultivars had values below 60%. Furthermore, correlation analysis demonstrated a positive and highly significant relationship between amylose content and length to breadth ratio (r = 0.59***), as well as between milling recovery and head rice recovery (r = 0.69***). A positive and significant correlation (r = 0.33*) was also observed between milling recovery and grain yield. Balamsari Dhan (12.30%), Kalo Masino Dhan (11.90%), and Bayarni Masino (11.40%) were identified for higher crude protein content. This study uncovered substantial variability among the landraces across various traits, highlighting their potential for use in breeding programs aimed at improving both quality and yield components of rice. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aRice _2AGROVOC _91243 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aGrain _2AGROVOC _91138 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aQuality _2AGROVOC _91231 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aCooking quality _2AGROVOC _927676 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLandraces _2AGROVOC _96305 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aMilling quality _2AGROVOC _916070 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aNutritive value _2AGROVOC _91193 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aChemicophysical properties _2AGROVOC _914310 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aAgronomic characters _2AGROVOC _91008 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aRegression analysis _2AGROVOC _95834 |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_aNepal _2AGROVOC _93932 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMadhav Prasad Pandey _938167 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aHira Kaji Manandhar _938168 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aTej Narayan Bhusal _938169 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aIssa, A.B. _gGlobal Maize Program _8I1706062 _9801 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_dGermany : Springer Nature, 2025. _tGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution _x0925-9864 _gv. 72, p. 6013–6026 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c68415 _d68407 |
||