000 03553nab a22003857a 4500
001 67881
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20250407162651.0
008 240906s1982 -us|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1525-3163 (Online)
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.554909x
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 1 _aLomas, L.W.
_936723
245 1 0 _aAmmonia treatment of corn silage. I. Feedlot performance of growing and finishing steers
260 _aUnited States of America :
_bAmerican Society of Animal Science ;
_bOxford University Press,
_c1982.
500 _aPeer review
520 _aThree experiments were conducted to compare the feedlot performance of cattle fed corn silage treated with cold-flow anhydrous ammonia (ANAM) with the performance of cattle fed corn silage treated with other forms of nonprotein nitrogen (NPN) at the time of ensiling or untreated silage supplemented with soybean meal (SBM) at feeding time. Various sources and levels of supplemental N and systems of protein and mineral supplementation were evaluated to determine their effect on the feedlot performance of growing and finishing steers. A weighted average across the three trials revealed that cattle fed ANAM-treated silage had a 4.5% lower average daily gain (ADG) and an 8.8% higher dry matter intake/kg of gain than those fed untreated corn silage supplemented with SBM to a similar crude protein equivalent. In trial 1, addition of minerals in the form of ammonia mineral suspension (AMS) at time of ensiling resulted in a higher ADG (P = .004) and lower intake/kg of gain (P = .007) than did addition of minerals to ammonia-treated silage at feeding time. However, in trial 3, addition of minerals or calcium hydroxide to ANAM-treated corn silage at the time of ensiling resulted in no improvement in animal performance. Soybean meal supplementation of silage treated with 7.80 or 10.29 g of ANAM/kg of corn silage dry matter (CSDM) during the initial phase of the feeding period resulted in a higher ADG (P<.0005) and lower DM consumption/kg of gain (P = .052) in trial 2. However, in trial 3, SBM supplementation of silage treated with 7.80 g of ANAM/kg CSDM resulted in no improvement in overall performance (P>.20). In trials 2 and 3, supplementing untreated corn silage with SBM at a percentage of the diet that was decreased as the cattle became heavier resulted in ADG and feed efficiency similar (P>.20) to those obtained from the feeding of a constant level of SBM throughout the feeding period. In trial 3, cattle fed ANAM-treated corn silage had higher marbling scores (P = .030) and higher quality grades (P = .030) than those fed untreated silage supplemented with SBM. Carcass data were not collected in trials 1 and 2.
546 _aText in English
650 7 _aAmmonia
_2AGROVOC
_92028
650 7 _aMaize
_2AGROVOC
_91173
650 7 _aNonprotein nitrogen
_2AGROVOC
_936724
650 7 _aProteins
_2AGROVOC
_91224
650 7 _aSilage
_2AGROVOC
_910374
650 7 _aFeedlots
_2AGROVOC
_933857
650 7 _aPerformance testing
_2AGROVOC
_94433
650 7 _aBullocks
_2AGROVOC
_926009
650 7 _aDry matter content
_2AGROVOC
_934163
650 7 _aCalcium hydroxide
_2AGROVOC
_924500
650 7 _aSoybeans
_2AGROVOC
_93639
700 1 _aFox, D.G.
_936725
700 1 _aBlack, J.R.
_936726
773 0 _dUnited States of America : American Society of Animal Science ; Oxford University Press, 1982.
_gv. 55, no. 4, p. 909–923
_tJournal of Animal Science
_wG74391
_x1525-3163 (Online)
942 _2ddc
_cJA
_n0
999 _c67881
_d67873