000 03176nab|a22003257a|4500
001 67097
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240116212131.0
008 202212s2022||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022 _a2320-7035
024 _ahttps://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2131276
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 0 _aGoshime Muluneh Mekasha
_932876
245 1 0 _aPerformance evaluation and identification of highland quality protein maize hybrids in Ethiopia
260 _bSCIENCEDOMAIN international,
_c2022.
_aUnited States of America :
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aBackground: Maize plays an indispensable role in meeting high food demand. It is globally one of the most widely adopted and cultivated crops. Hybrid development from fixed inbred lines is one of the strategies for the improvement of maize production. The national average maize yield is low in East Africa; thus, the selection of promising germplasm has a great role to meet the high food demand of growing the population. Forty-two Quality Protein Maize (QPM) crosses (21 inbred lines each crossed with two testers) along with three popular standard hybrids checks were evaluated in two replications using alpha lattice during the 2017 cropping season at Ambo, Arsi-Negele, and Kulumsa. The objective of this study was to evaluate and select the best new QPM hybrids for grain yield, and other agronomic and morphological characteristics. Results: Significant difference among crosses was observed for 19 traits at Ambo, 14 traits at Arsi-Negele, and 19 traits at Kulumsa. Out of 28 traits studied, six of them did not show genotype by location interaction but they showed a significant genotypic effect. These traits were: Days to Silking (DS), Number of Ears per plant (EPP), Ear Length (EL), Kernels Per Row (KPR), Ear Diameter (ED), and Thousand Seed Weight (TSW). Based on the mean performance in the combined analysis, from 42 new QPM crosse, six of them (L8xT2, L7xT1, L8xT1, L19xT1, L6xT2, and L18xT1) were scored higher grain yield compared with the mean of the three standard checks and best conventional maize (CM) check (AMH853). L8xT2, L7xT1, L8xT1 crosses showed a higher grain yield advantage over the best check (AMH853) by 20.87, 14.13, and 13.63%, respectively. Conclusion: The study implicated the existence of a difference between the newly developed hybrids and the standard check varieties. In general, the study enabled us to identify promising crosses that could be forwarded for further use in maize breeding programs in future work.
546 _aText in English
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91173
_aMaize
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91223
_aProtein quality
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_926603
_aCross-breeding
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91151
_aHybrids
651 7 _2AGROVOC
_92025
_aEthiopia
700 1 _aChere, A.T.
_9791
_8I1705938
_gGlobal Maize Program
773 _tInternational Journal of Plant & Soil Science
_gv. 34, no. 21, p. 387-406
_dUnited States of America : SCIENCEDOMAIN international, 2022.
_x2320-7035
_wu57479
856 _yOpen Access through DSpace
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/22928
942 _cJA
_n0
_2ddc
999 _c67097
_d67089