000 03372nab|a22003737a|4500
001 67096
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240116211900.0
008 202212s2022||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022 _a2320-7035
024 _ahttps://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231373
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 0 _aGoshime Muluneh Mekasha
_932876
245 1 0 _aEstimation of general and specific combining ability effects for quality protein maize inbred lines
260 _bSCIENCEDOMAIN international,
_c2022.
_aUnited States of America :
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aBackground: Maize (Zea mays L.) plays a critical role in meeting high food demand. It is globally one of the most widely adapted and cultivated crops. Hybrid development from fixed inbred lines is one of the strategies for the improvement of maize production. The national average maize yield in Ethiopia is low and thus, selection of promising germplasm and knowledge of combining ability are prerequisites to developing high yielding maize varieties. Forty-two Quality Protein Maize (QPM) crosses (21 inbred lines each crossed with two testers) along with three popular standard hybrids were evaluated in two replications using alpha lattice during the 2017 cropping season at Ambo, Arsi-Negele, and Kulumsa. The objectives of this study were to identify lines with high GCA and estimate the SCA of crosses for grain yield, and other agronomic and morphological characters. Results: Significant difference among crosses was observed for 19 traits at Ambo, 14 traits at ArsiNegele, and 19 traits at Kulumsa in the hybrid trial. Regarding the GCA effect, L8 had a significant difference to the positive side with the highest magnitude of GCA effect at three locations (3.40, 2.03, and 1.88 GCA effect values at Arsi-Negele, Ambo, and Kulumsa, respectively) which is followed by L7 for GY. All crosses did not show a significant SCA effect for GY in both directions at Ambo and Arsi-Negele but at Kulumsa, five crosses: L2xT1(1.89), L13xT2(1.88), L7xT1(1.86), L4xT2(1.49) and L19xT1(1.41) showed significant difference. In the combined analysis for six traits, Additive gene action was more important which was manifested by a higher sum square contribution of DS (79.6) EPP (79.3%), EL (80.0%), KPR (80.1%), ED (78.5%) and TSW (79.1%). Conclusion: Based on mean grain yield, and combining ability, L8xT2, L7xT1, L8xT1, L19xT1, L6xT2, and L18xT1 are promising crosses that could be forwarded for further use in maize breeding programs for further works.
546 _aText in English
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_92367
_aCombining ability
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91173
_aMaize
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91223
_aProtein quality
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91155
_aInbred lines
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_94371
_aData analysis
651 7 _2AGROVOC
_92025
_aEthiopia
700 1 _aChere, A.T.
_9791
_8I1705938
_gGlobal Maize Program
700 1 _aAli, H. M.
_926606
700 1 _aDagne Wegary Gissa
_9952
_8INT3401
_gGlobal Maize Program
700 0 _aSolomon Admassu Seyoum
_932877
773 _tInternational Journal of Plant & Soil Science
_gv. 34, no. 22, p. 209-237
_dUnited States of America : SCIENCEDOMAIN international, 2022.
_x2320-7035
_wu57479
856 _yOpen Access through DSpace
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/22927
942 _cJA
_n0
_2ddc
999 _c67096
_d67088