000 | 03197nab|a22004097a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 66232 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20230818155500.0 | ||
008 | 20234s2023||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a0040-5752 | ||
022 | _a1432-2242 (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04352-8 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aAlemu, A. _911491 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aHaplotype-tagged SNPs improve genomic prediction accuracy for Fusarium head blight resistance and yield-related traits in wheat |
260 |
_bSpringer Verlag, _c2023. _aBerlin (Germany) : |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aGenomic prediction is a powerful tool to enhance genetic gain in plant breeding. However, the method is accompanied by various complications leading to low prediction accuracy. One of the major challenges arises from the complex dimensionality of marker data. To overcome this issue, we applied two pre-selection methods for SNP markers viz. LD-based haplotype-tagging and GWAS-based trait-linked marker identification. Six different models were tested with preselected SNPs to predict the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of four traits measured in 419 winter wheat genotypes. Ten different sets of haplotype-tagged SNPs were selected by adjusting the level of LD thresholds. In addition, various sets of trait-linked SNPs were identified with different scenarios from the training-test combined and only from the training populations. The BRR and RR-BLUP models developed from haplotype-tagged SNPs had a higher prediction accuracy for FHB and SPW by 0.07 and 0.092, respectively, compared to the corresponding models developed without marker pre-selection. The highest prediction accuracy for SPW and FHB was achieved with tagged SNPs pruned at weak LD thresholds (r2 < 0.5), while stringent LD was required for spike length (SPL) and flag leaf area (FLA). Trait-linked SNPs identified only from training populations failed to improve the prediction accuracy of the four studied traits. Pre-selection of SNPs via LD-based haplotype-tagging could play a vital role in optimizing genomic selection and reducing genotyping costs. Furthermore, the method could pave the way for developing low-cost genotyping methods through customized genotyping platforms targeting key SNP markers tagged to essential haplotype blocks. | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aBreeding _2AGROVOC _91029 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aFusarium _2AGROVOC _92705 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGenetic linkage _2AGROVOC _910050 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGenetic markers _2AGROVOC _91848 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGenotypes _2AGROVOC _91134 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aLeaf area _2AGROVOC _927935 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSingle nucleotide polymorphisms _gAGROVOC _910805 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aWheat _2AGROVOC _91310 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBatista, L. _930680 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aPawan Kumar Singh _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT2868 _9868 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCeplitis, A. _930681 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aChawade, A. _97735 |
|
773 | 0 |
_tTheoretical and Applied Genetics _gv. 136, no. 4, art. 92 _dBerlin (Germany) : Springer Verlag, 2023 _wG444762 _x0040-5752 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/22571 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c66232 _d66224 |