000 02511nab|a22003617a|4500
001 66092
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240919021233.0
008 20231s2023||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022 _a1940-3372 (Online)
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20305
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 1 _aMontesinos-Lopez, O.A.
_8I1706800
_92700
_gGenetic Resources Program
245 1 0 _aSparse multi-trait genomic prediction under balanced incomplete block design
260 _bWiley,
_c2023.
_aUSA :
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aSparse testing is essential to increase the efficiency of the genomic selection methodology, as the same efficiency (in this case prediction power) can be obtained while using less genotypes evaluated in the fields. For this reason, it is important to evaluate the existing methods for performing the allocation of lines to environments. With this goal, four methods (M1–M4) to allocate lines to environments were evaluated under the context of a multi-trait genomic prediction problem: M1 denotes the allocation of a fraction (subset) of lines in all locations, M2 denotes the allocation of a fraction of lines with some shared lines in locations but not arranged based on the balanced incomplete block design (BIBD) principle, M3 denotes the random allocation of a subset of lines to locations, and M4 denotes the allocation of a subset of lines to locations using the BIBD principle. The evaluation was done using seven real multi-environment data sets common in plant breeding programs. We found that the best method was M4 and the worst was M1, while no important differences were found between M3 and M4. We concluded that M4 and M3 are efficient in the context of sparse testing for multi-trait prediction.
546 _aText in English
591 _aMontesinos-Lopez, O.A. : No CIMMYT Affiliation
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91132
_aGenomics
650 7 _aPlant breeding
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91203
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_910737
_aMarker-assisted selection
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_921704
_aBreeding programmes
700 1 _aMosqueda-Gonzalez, B.A.
_919441
700 1 _aSalinas-Ruiz, J.
_94951
700 1 _aMontesinos-Lopez, A.
_92702
700 1 _aCrossa, J.
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8CCJL01
_959
773 0 _tPlant Genome
_dUSA : Wiley, 2023.
_gv. 16, no. 2, e20305
_wu94757
_x1940-3372
856 4 _yOpen Access through DSpace
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/22536
942 _cJA
_n0
_2ddc
999 _c66092
_d66084