000 | 02854nab|a22003377a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 65582 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20240919021233.0 | ||
008 | 202101s2022||||xxk|||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a0030-7270 | ||
022 | _a2043-6866 (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/00307270221122189 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBadstue, L.B. _gFormerly Socioeconomics Program _8CBLO01 _91951 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aGender, wheat trait preferences, and innovation uptake : _blessons from Ethiopia and India |
260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bSAGE Publications, _c2022. |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
520 | _aDuring the post-Green Revolution era, numerous improved wheat varieties were released and disseminated to enhance tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and increase productivity. Still, in the wheat-based farming systems of the Global South, gender-based and other social inequalities continue to undermine equitable access to improved varieties, especially for women, poor, and marginalized farmers. Here, we present a case for gender-sensitive technology development, dissemination, and evaluation as part of wheat varietal improvement programs. We take stock of the various challenges that persist in the uptake of modern wheat varieties by male and female smallholders. We focus on Ethiopia and India, two geographies with substantive wheat economies, widespread poverty, and gender inequalities. The socio-economic literature on wheat is relatively thin with limited and dated gender-sensitive evaluation studies on varietal technologies in these countries. Varietal technology evaluations could ideally cover gender differences in relation to wheat varietal trait preferences, technology adoption, and associated decision-making and labor-use changes related to new varieties and complementary technologies, as well as nutritional and economic benefits. The paper calls for a need to change the institutional arrangements in wheat research-and-development (R&D) programs to understand and pursue better paths for wheat improvement to proactively contribute toward gender equity and inclusivity. | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aGender _2AGROVOC _91123 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aSocial inclusion _2AGROVOC _928724 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aEquality _2AGROVOC _911905 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPlant breeding _gAGROVOC _2 _91203 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aKrishna, V.V. _8INT2994 _gSocioeconomics Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _9558 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDebello, M. J. _gSocioeconomics Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3210 _9903 |
|
700 | 1 |
_8001711820 _aGartaula, H. _gSocioeconomics Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _911063 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aErenstein, O. _8INT2677 _9848 _gFormerly Socioeconomics Program |
|
773 | 0 |
_tOutlook on Agriculture _dUnited Kingdom : SAGE Publications, 2022. _x0030-7270 _gIn press _wG444646 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c65582 _d65574 |