000 | 02972nab|a22003977a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 65478 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20230413222237.0 | ||
008 | 20226s2022||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a0022-0957 | ||
022 | _a1460-2431 (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac144 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 0 |
_aPengcheng Hu _924274 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aPhenological optimization of late reproductive phase for raising wheat yield potential in irrigated mega-environments |
260 |
_bOxford University Press, _c2022. _aOxford (United Kingdom) : |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aIncreasing grain number through fine-tuning duration of the late reproductive phase (LRP; terminal spikelet to anthesis) without altering anthesis time has been proposed as a genetic strategy to increase yield potential (YP) of wheat. Here we conducted a modelling analysis to evaluate the potential of fine-tuning LRP in raising YP in irrigated mega-environments. Using the known optimal anthesis and sowing date of current elite benchmark genotypes, we applied a gene-based phenology model for long-term simulations of phenological stages and yield-related variables of all potential germplasm with the same duration to anthesis as the benchmark genotypes. These diverse genotypes had the same duration to anthesis but varying LRP duration. Lengthening LRP increased YP and harvest index by increasing grain number to some extent and an excessively long LRP reduced YP due to reduced time for canopy construction for high biomass production of pre-anthesis phase. The current elite genotypes could have their LRP extended for higher YP in most sites. Genotypes with a ratio of the duration of LRP to pre-anthesis phase of about 0.42 ensured high yields (≥95% of YP) with their optimal sowing and anthesis dates. Optimization of intermediate growth stages could be further evaluated in breeding programmes to improve YP. | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aBreeding _2AGROVOC _91029 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aCrop modelling _2AGROVOC _92623 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aEnvironment _2AGROVOC _91098 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPhenology _2AGROVOC _94770 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aSpring wheat _2AGROVOC _91806 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aMaximum sustainable yield _gAGROVOC _910792 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aChapman, S. _9458 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSukumaran, S. _8INT3330 _9920 _gFormerly Global Wheat Program |
|
700 | 1 |
_aReynolds, M.P. _8INT1511 _9831 _gGlobal Wheat Program |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBangyou Zheng _93434 |
|
773 | 0 |
_tJournal of Experimental Botany _gv. 73, no. 12, p. 4236-4249 _dOxford (United Kingdom) : Oxford University Press, 2022 _x0022-0957 _wG444540 |
|
856 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/22126 |
||
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c65478 _d65470 |