000			03320nab a22002777a 4500
001			65439
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20220721153804.0
008			22070821997|||m-uk||p|op||||00||0|eengdd
022			_a0308-521X
022			_a1873-2267 (online)
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_aGrimble, R. _928072
245	1	0	_aStakeholder methodologies in natural resource management : _ba review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities
260			_bElsevier, _c1997. _aUnited Kingdom :
520			_aStakeholder analysis (SA) is a powerful tool for policy analysis and formulation, and has considerable potential in natural resource policy and programme development. It is an approach for understanding a system, and changes in it, by identifying key actors or stakeholders and assessing their respective interests in that system. It has been developed in response to the challenge of multiple interests and objectives, and particularly the search for efficient, equitable and environmentally sustainable development strategies. This paper reviews the underlying concepts and methods of SA and the underlying links between economic efficiency, equity and environmental concerns. It examines the particular characteristics of natural resources management (NRM) which make it particularly appropriate for the application of SA: these include multiple uses and users of the resource; unclear or open access property rights; temporal trade-offs; the presence of externalities; and imperfect markets. It discusses a classificational system which distinguishes between conflicts and trade-offs, and briefly reviews parallel methodological developments, including cost-benefit analysis (CBA), decision analysis, conflict resolution and social actor perspectives, and suggests areas of complementarity. A number of key issues are raised in the review that have implications for the future direction of SA. These include: the areas in which SA has particular relevance; its value to NRM policy-makers and others in overcoming trade-offs and conflict; the different levels and circumstances in which it might most usefully be applied; and its potential for representing the interests of different groups, including the most disadvantaged, as the basis for interventions. The paper highlights some research and methodological needs directly relevant to natural resource managers and intended beneficiaries, namely: (a) acquiring empirical knowledge and understanding of the key stakeholders involved in the process and the factors governing their resource allocation procedures; (b) developing improved systems, frameworks and methodologies for analysing situations and incorporating stakeholder and institutional concerns; (c) developing knowledge of the opportunities and scope for action by policy-makers and facilitators in the design of interventions and the resolution of conflicts.
546			_aText in English
650		7	_aStakeholders _2AGROVOC _94362
650		7	_aNatural resources management _92772 _2AGROVOC
650		7	_aResearch _2AGROVOC _99142
700	1		_928073 _aWellard, K.
773			_dUnited Kingdom : Elsevier, 1997. _gvol. 55, no 2, p. 173-193 _tAgricultural Systems _wG444466 _x0308-521X
942			_cJA _n0 _2ddc
999			_c65439 _d65431