000 | 03261nab|a22004697a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 65424 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20240919020954.0 | ||
008 | 20221s2022||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a0040-5752 | ||
022 | _a1432-2242 (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04147-3 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFentaye Kassa Semagn _8INT2869 _9869 _gGlobal Maize Program |
|
245 | 1 | _aComparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat | |
260 |
_bSpringer, _c2022. _aBerlin (Germany) : |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
520 | _aThe predictive ability of multi-trait and single-trait prediction models has not been investigated on diverse traits evaluated under organic and conventional management systems. Here, we compared the predictive abilities of 25% of a testing set that has not been evaluated for a single trait (ST), not evaluated for multi-traits (MT1), and evaluated for some traits but not others (MT2) in three spring wheat populations genotyped either with the wheat 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms array or DArTseq. Analyses were performed on seven agronomic traits evaluated under conventional and organic management systems, four to seven disease resistance traits, and all agronomic and disease resistance traits simultaneously. The average prediction accuracies of the ST, MT1, and MT2 models varied from 0.03 to 0.78 (mean 0.41), from 0.05 to 0.82 (mean 0.47), and from 0.05 to 0.92 (mean 0.67), respectively. The predictive ability of the MT2 model was significantly greater than the ST model in all traits and populations except common bunt with the MT1 model being intermediate between them. The MT2 model increased prediction accuracies over the ST and MT1 models in all traits by 9.0–82.4% (mean 37.3%) and 2.9–82.5% (mean 25.7%), respectively, except common bunt that showed up to 7.7% smaller accuracies in two populations. A joint analysis of all agronomic and disease resistance traits further improved accuracies within the MT1 and MT2 models on average by 21.4% and 17.4%, respectively, as compared to either the agronomic or disease resistance traits, demonstrating the high potential of the multi-traits models in improving prediction accuracies. | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aAgronomy _2AGROVOC _96289 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aForecasting _2AGROVOC _92701 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aDisease resistance _2AGROVOC _91077 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aModelling _2AGROVOC _911710 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aSpring wheat _2AGROVOC _91806 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGenes _2AGROVOC _93563 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCrossa, J. _gGenetic Resources Program _8CCJL01 _959 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCuevas, J. _94437 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aIqbal, M. _911300 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCiechanowska, I. _927368 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aHenríquez, M.A. _921986 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aRandhawa, H. S. _95865 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBeres, B.L. _98802 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aAboukhaddour, R. _911627 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMcCallum, B.D. _911628 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBrûlé-Babel, A.L. _927370 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aN’Diaye, A. _93087 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aPozniak, C.J. _93065 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSpaner, D. _917724 |
|
773 | 0 |
_tTheoretical and Applied Genetics _dBerlin (Germany) : Springer, 2022 _x0040-5752 _gv 135, p. 2747–2767 _wG444762 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
999 |
_c65424 _d65416 |