| 000 | 01804nab|a22003737a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 65199 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20241108164545.0 | ||
| 008 | 20221s2022||||mx |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
| 022 | _a1061-4036 | ||
| 022 | _a1546-1718 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01046-7 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPixley, K.V. _8INT1617 _9832 _gGenetic Resources Program |
|
| 245 | 1 | 1 | _aGenome-edited crops for improved food security of smallholder farmers |
| 260 |
_bNature Publishing Group, _c2022. _aUnited Kingdom : |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aWidespread enthusiasm about potential contributions of genome-edited crops to address climate change, food security, nutrition and health, environmental sustainability and diversification of agriculture is dampened by concerns about the associated risks. Analysis of the top seven risks of genome-edited crops finds that the scientific risks are comparable to those of accepted, past and current breeding methods, but failure to address regulatory, legal and trade framework, and the granting of social license, squanders the potential benefits. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _923072 _aGene editing |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91118 _aFood security |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_gAGROVOC _91763 _aSmallholders |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91045 _aClimate change |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aFalck-Zepeda, J.B. _94814 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPaarlberg, R. _9245 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPhillips, P.W.B. _927165 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSlamet-Loedin, I. _912826 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_8I1706696 _aDhugga, K. _gGenetic Resource Program _94340 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aCampos, H. _96253 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aGutterson, N. _926431 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tNature Genetics _dUnited Kingdom : Nature Publishing Group, 2022 _x1061-4036 _gvol. 54, p. 364–367 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c65199 _d65191 |
||