| 000 | 02997nab|a22003857a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 64434 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20230630193512.0 | ||
| 008 | 202110s2021||||sz |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
| 022 | _a2072-4292 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204091 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aNdlovu, H.S. _924381 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 2 | _aA comparative estimation of maize leaf water content using machine learning techniques and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based proximal and remotely sensed data |
| 260 |
_aBasel (Switzerland) : _bMDPI, _c2021. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aDetermining maize water content variability is necessary for crop monitoring and in developing early warning systems to optimise agricultural production in smallholder farms. However, spatially explicit information on maize water content, particularly in Southern Africa, remains elementary due to the shortage of efficient and affordable primary sources of suitable spatial data at a local scale. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), equipped with light-weight multispectral sensors, provide spatially explicit, near-real-time information for determining the maize crop water status at farm scale. Therefore, this study evaluated the utility of UAV-derived multispectral imagery and machine learning techniques in estimating maize leaf water indicators: equivalent water thickness (EWT), fuel moisture content (FMC), and specific leaf area (SLA). The results illustrated that both NIR and red-edge derived spectral variables were critical in characterising the maize water indicators on smallholder farms. Furthermore, the best models for estimating EWT, FMC, and SLA were derived from the random forest regression (RFR) algorithm with an rRMSE of 3.13%, 1%, and 3.48%, respectively. Additionally, EWT and FMC yielded the highest predictive performance and were the most optimal indicators of maize leaf water content. The findings are critical towards developing a robust and spatially explicit monitoring framework of maize water status and serve as a proxy of crop health and the overall productivity of smallholder maize farms. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aPrecision agriculture _94619 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCrop monitoring _911128 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aUnmanned aerial vehicles _911401 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aSmallholders _91763 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMachine learning _911127 _2AGROVOC |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aOdindi, J. _924382 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSibanda, M. _923029 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMutanga, O. _919859 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aClulow, A.D. _923030 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aChimonyo, V.G.P. _8001712688 _gSustainable Intensification Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _919177 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMabhaudhi, T. _918478 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tRemote Sensing _gv. 13, no. 20, art. 4091 _dBasel (Switzerland) : MDPI, 2021. _x2072-4292 _w57403 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/21718 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c64434 _d64426 |
||