000 02851nab a22003617a 4500
999 _c64238
_d64230
001 64238
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20211006073111.0
008 200211s2021 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0305-750X
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105519
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 1 _923199
_aTambo, J.A.
245 1 0 _aGender-differentiated impacts of plant clinics on maize productivity and food security :
_bevidence from Zambia
260 _aUnited Kingdom :
_bElsevier,
_c2021.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aThe United Nation’s declaration of 2020 as the International Year of Plant Health underscores the crucial role of crop protection in achieving the sustainable development goals. In this article, we analyse the gendered impacts of plant clinics—an innovative extension approach that aims to help smallholder farmers to lose less of their crops to pests through the provision of plant health diagnostic and advisory services. In particular, we investigate whether male and female farmers accrue similar benefits, in terms of technology adoption, maize productivity and food security, from participating in plant clinics. We use gender-disaggregated plot-level data from maize producers in Zambia. Applying doubly robust estimators, we find that participation in plant clinics stimulates the adoption of multiple pest management strategies, which boost maize yield and income by 14% and 27% respectively, and ultimately help to stave off food insecurity. A disaggregated analysis shows that both male and female farmers achieve positive outcomes from using plant clinic services, but the effects are disproportionately greater for male farmers. We also observe heterogeneous impacts for female household heads and female spouses, reflecting differences in decision-making power within the household. The findings suggest that plant clinics can play a significant role in helping male and female farmers address crop health problems and reduce transitory food insecurity, but female participants (particularly female spouses) will need additional support if the goal is to bridge the gender gap in agricultural productivity.
546 _aText in English
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91003
_aAgricultural extension
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91123
_aGender
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_97443
_aAgricultural productivity
650 7 _aFood security
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91118
651 7 _2AGROVOC
_94309
_aZambia
700 1 _923206
_aMatimelo, M.
700 1 _923207
_aNdhlovu, M.
700 1 _923208
_aMbugua, F.
700 1 _923209
_aPhiri, N.
773 0 _dUnited Kingdom : Elsevier, 2021.
_gv. 145, art. 105519
_tWorld Development
_x0305-750X
_w444788
856 4 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105519
_yClick here to access online
942 _2ddc
_cJA
_n0