| 000 | 00595nab|a22002177a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c64117 _d64109 |
||
| 001 | 64117 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20210902152818.0 | ||
| 008 | 190824s2021||||xxk|||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
| 022 | _a0962-1083 | ||
| 022 | _a1365-294X (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15724 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aDrinkwater, R. _922367 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aLeech blood-meal invertebrate-derived DNA reveals differences in Bornean mammal diversity across habitats |
| 260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bWiley, _c2021. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 500 | _aOpen Access | ||
| 520 | _aThe application of metabarcoding to environmental and invertebrate-derived DNA (eDNA and iDNA) is a new and increasingly applied method for monitoring biodiversity across a diverse range of habitats. This approach is particularly promising for sampling in the biodiverse humid tropics, where rapid land-use change for agriculture means there is a growing need to understand the conservation value of the remaining mosaic and degraded landscapes. Here we use iDNA from blood-feeding leeches (Haemadipsa picta) to assess differences in mammalian diversity across a gradient of forest degradation in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. We screened 557 individual leeches for mammal DNA by targeting fragments of the 16S rRNA gene and detected 14 mammalian genera. We recorded lower mammal diversity in the most heavily degraded forest compared to higher quality twice logged forest. Although the accumulation curves of diversity estimates were comparable across these habitat types, diversity was higher in twice logged forest, with more taxa of conservation concern. In addition, our analysis revealed differences between the community recorded in the heavily logged forest and that of the twice logged forest. By revealing differences in mammal diversity across a human-modified tropical landscape, our study demonstrates the value of iDNA as a noninvasive biomonitoring approach in conservation assessments. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aRasheed, A. : No CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91403 _aBiodiversity |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _913434 _aDNA |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _911655 _aLand use change |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _922368 _aBiomonitoring |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922369 _aJucker, T. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922370 _aPotter, J.H.T. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922371 _aSwinfield, T. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_911554 _aCoomes, D. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922372 _aSlade, E.M. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922373 _aGilbert, M.T.P. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922374 _aLewis, O.T. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922375 _aBernard, H. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922376 _aStruebig, M.J. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922377 _aClare, E.L. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_922378 _aRossiter, S.J. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tMolecular Ecology _dUnited Kingdom : Wiley, 2021. _x0962-1083 _gv. 30, no. 13, p. 3299-3312 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yClick here to access online _uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15724 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||