000			02055nab a22003257a 4500
999			_c63815 _d63807
001			63815
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20211006085229.0
008			180103s2021 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a0306-9192
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102070
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_920107 _aSanou, A.
245	1	0	_aIntroducing an aflatoxin-safe labeling program in complex food supply chains : _bevidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria
260			_aLondon (United Kingdom) : _bElsevier, _c2021.
500			_aPeer review
520			_aFood contaminated with aflatoxins is one of the more prominent food safety issues facing developing countries. These toxins impose an immense burden on countries that have to deal with the repercussions of the contamination. Repercussions include increased public health concerns, increased health care expenditures, and other economic tolls. To alleviate these food safety concerns, the implementation of aflatoxin-safe certification can potentially incentivize and elevate food safety standards. This study uses a discrete choice experiment approach to assess if traders are willing to pay a price premium for aflatoxin-safe maize and whether such a premium varies across their market channels. Results indicate that maize traders who sell to other traders, large feed mills, food companies, and retailers exhibit a higher willingness to pay (WTP) for aflatoxin-safe certification compared to those who sell to small feed mills and consumers. Relevant policy implications are discussed.
546			_aText in English
650		7	_95637 _aAflatoxins _2AGROVOC
650		7	_99204 _aTrade _2AGROVOC
650		7	_98946 _aWillingness to Pay _2AGROVOC
650		7	_aMaize _gAGROVOC _2 _91173
651		7	_2AGROVOC _94370 _aNigeria
700	1		_920097 _aLiverpool-Tasie, L.S.O.
700	1		_920108 _aCaputo, V.
700	1		_920109 _aKerr, J.
773	0		_gIn press _tFood Policy _x0306-9192 _dLondon (United Kingdom) : Elsevier, 2021. _w444320
942			_2ddc _cJA _n0