000			nab a22 7a 4500
999			_c63115 _d63107
001			63115
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20210122215219.0
008			202101s2020||||ne |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022			_a0168-1656
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.11.010
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_aBhat, J.A. _917928
245	1	0	_aHarnessing high-throughput phenotyping and genotyping for enhanced drought tolerance in crop plants
260			_aAmsterdam (Netherlands) : _bElsevier, _c2020.
500			_aPeer review
520			_aDevelopment of drought-tolerant cultivars is one of the challenging tasks for the plant breeders due to its complex inheritance and polygenic regulation. Evaluating genetic material for drought tolerance is a complex process due to its spatiotemporal interactions with environmental factors. The conventional breeding approaches are costly, lengthy, and inefficient to achieve the expected gain in drought tolerance. In this regard, genomics-assisted breeding (GAB) offers promise to develop cultivars with improved drought tolerance in a more efficient, quicker, and cost-effective manner. The success of GAB depends upon the precision in marker-trait association and estimation of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs), which mostly depends on coverage and precision of genotyping and phenotyping. A wide gap between the discovery and practical use of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for crop improvement has been observed for many important agronomical traits. Such a limitation could be due to the low accuracy in QTL detection, mainly resulting from low marker density and manually collected phenotypes of complex agronomic traits. Increasing marker density using the high-throughput genotyping (HTG), and accurate and precise phenotyping using high-throughput digital phenotyping (HTP) platforms can improve the precision and power of QTL detection. Therefore, both HTG and HTP can enhance the practical utility of GAB along with a faster characterization of germplasm and breeding material. In the present review, we discussed how the recent innovations in HTG and HTP would assist in the breeding of improved drought-tolerant varieties. We have also discussed strategies, tools, and analytical advances made on the HTG and HTP along with their pros and cons.
546			_aText in English
650		7	_aDrought stress _2AGROVOC _91081
650		7	_aGenomics _2AGROVOC _91132
650		7	_aMarker-assisted selection _2AGROVOC _910737
650		7	_aStress _2AGROVOC _91277
650		7	_aTolerance _2AGROVOC _94711
700	1		_aDeshmukh, R. _917929
700	0		_aTuanjie Zhao _917930
700	1		_aPatil, G. _917931
700	1		_aDeokar, A. _917932
700	1		_aShinde, S. _917933
700	1		_aChaudhary, J. _917934
773	0		_tJournal of Biotechnology _gv. 324, p. 248-260 _dAmsterdam (Netherlands) : Elsevier, 2021. _x0168-1656 _wu444508
942			_cJA _n0 _2ddc