000 | 02836nab|a22003737a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c63067 _d63059 |
||
001 | 63067 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20220413201809.0 | ||
008 | 200910s2020||||sz |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a1664-462X (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00197 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSehgal, D. _9922 _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT3332 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aIncorporating genome-wide association mapping results into genomic prediction models for grain yield and yield stability in CIMMYT spring bread wheat |
260 |
_aSwitzerland : _bFrontiers, _c2020. |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aUntangling the genetic architecture of grain yield (GY) and yield stability is an important determining factor to optimize genomics-assisted selection strategies in wheat. We conducted in-depth investigation on the above using a large set of advanced bread wheat lines (4,302), which were genotyped with genotyping-by-sequencing markers and phenotyped under contrasting (irrigated and stress) environments. Haplotypes-based genome-wide-association study (GWAS) identified 58 associations with GY and 15 with superiority index Pi (measure of stability). Sixteen associations with GY were “environment-specific” with two on chromosomes 3B and 6B with the large effects and 8 associations were consistent across environments and trials. For Pi, 8 associations were from chromosomes 4B and 7B, indicating ‘hot spot’ regions for stability. Epistatic interactions contributed to an additional 5–9% variation on average. We further explored whether integrating consistent and robust associations identified in GWAS as fixed effects in prediction models improves prediction accuracy. For GY, the model accounting for the haplotype-based GWAS loci as fixed effects led to up to 9–10% increase in prediction accuracy, whereas for Pi this approach did not provide any advantage. This is the first report of integrating genetic architecture of GY and yield stability into prediction models in wheat. | ||
526 |
_aWC _cFP3 |
||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91296 _aTriticum aestivum |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGenomes _gAGROVOC _2 _91131 |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _910737 _aMarker-assisted selection |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91132 _aGenomics |
|
700 | 1 |
_94557 _aRosyara, U. _8I1707470 _gGlobal Wheat Program |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMondal, S. _gFormerly Global Wheat Program _8INT3211 _9904 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSingh, R.P. _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT0610 _9825 |
|
700 | 1 |
_92092 _aPoland, J.A. |
|
700 | 1 |
_9851 _aDreisigacker, S. _8INT2692 _gGlobal Wheat Program |
|
773 | 0 |
_tFrontiers in Plant Science _gv. 11, art. 197 _dSwitzerland : Frontiers, 2020. _x1664-462X _wu56875 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/21102 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |