000			03691nab|a22003737a|4500
999			_c63045 _d63037
001			63045
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20211006082243.0
008			201231s2020||||xxu|||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022			_a1932-6203
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242161
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
100	1		_aGupta, S. _910787
245	1	0	_aDesigning better input support programs : _blessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India
260			_aSan Francisco, CA (USA) : _bPublic Library of Science, _c2020.
500			_aPeer review
500			_aOpen Access
520			_aIndia has one of the largest agricultural input support programs in the world, delivered in the form of subsidies to farmers, raising concerns about its sustainability. This paper evaluates the performance of one such support, the micronutrient subsidy program in the state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) and presents a case for providing this support in the form of direct cash transfers. Under the program, key soil micronutrients- zinc, boron, and gypsum were distributed free of cost to farmers living in micronutrient-deficient areas, with identification and targeting managed entirely by the state. We survey 1621 farmers, 61 agriculture extension officers, and 78 agriculture input dealers to assess the efficacy of the program and to identify bottlenecks preventing effective targeting, with a focus on zinc. We find that use of non-subsidized zinc is high in AP, and awareness of benefits of zinc and physical access to input dealer shops are significant predictors of zinc use. We argue that the free provision of micronutrients may have created demand among farmers, but there is little justification to continue subsidizing such a program at such high rates or resorting to public distribution. We find that micronutrient procurement and distribution has become a burden on extension staff and crowds out the private sector. Our analysis shows that the subsidy can benefit more farmers if it is channeled through the network of private fertilizer dealers. We use administrative data on budgetary outlays and digital soil maps to suggest fiscal redistribution in the form of direct cash transfers that may ensure more effective targeting at a lower cost to the state.
536			_aThis work was undertaken as part of the Soil Intelligence Systems (SIS) and Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) projects funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM). The authors would like to thank the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), the Department of Agriculture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Adventz Group and Yara International for their support in the implementation of the study. The authors are also grateful to Network for Engineering and Economics Research and Management (NEERMAN) Pvt Ltd and Kabil Professional Services Pvt. Ltd for support in data collection.
546			_aText in English
650		7	_aAgricultural workers _2AGROVOC _95259
650		7	_aFertilizers _gAGROVOC _2 _91111
650		7	_aTrace element deficiencies _2AGROVOC _98917
650		7	_aCereal crops _2AGROVOC _96794
650		7	_aBoron _2AGROVOC _98928
651		7	_2AGROVOC _93726 _aIndia
700	1		_aKishore, A. _910920
700	1		_aAlvi, M. _910921
700	1		_aSingh, V. _910788
773	0		_gv. 15, no. 12, e0242161 _dSan Francisco, CA (USA) : Public Library of Science, 2020. _x1932-6203 _tPLoS One _wu94957
856	4		_uhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242161 _yClick here to access online
942			_cJA _n0 _2ddc