000 | 03172nab|a22004217a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c62449 _d62441 |
||
001 | 62449 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20240919020951.0 | ||
008 | 200818s2021||||ne |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a0929-1393 | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103733 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aRomero-Salas, E.A. _95116 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aChanges in the bacterial community structure in soil under conventional and conservation practices throughout a complete maize (Zea mays L.) crop cycle |
260 |
_aAmsterdam (Netherlands) : _bElsevier, _c2021. |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aAgricultural practices and changes in soil conditions, such as water content, inorganic N content, temperature, pH and organic material availability, affect the bacterial community structure. Soil characteristics and the bacterial community structure were monitored in soil with maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation, zero tillage and crop residue kept (ZTRK) or removed (ZTRR), and conventional tillage with monoculture maize (CTMR) or maize-wheat rotation and crop residue removed (CTRR) or kept in the field and ploughed in (CTRK). The soil organic C was significantly affected by tillage practices and decreased ZTRK > CTRK > CTRR = ZTRR > CTMR, while water content and NO3− concentration showed large fluctuations over the crop cycle, but were not affected significantly by agricultural practices. The bacterial community structure showed large changes over the crop cycle determined by varying soil characteristics, most importantly water content and NO3− concentration and six bacterial genera, i.e. Achromobacter, Bacillus, Halomonas, Kaistobacter, Pseudomonas and Serratia, while changes due to agricultural practices were much smaller. It was found that the bacterial community structure was affected significantly by time, tillage (zero tillage versus conventional tillage), crop residue management (kept versus removed) and crop rotation (CTMR versus CTRR treatment). | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aCrop residues _2AGROVOC _91064 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aLong term experiments _2AGROVOC _913430 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aField Experimentation _2AGROVOC _98629 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aMaize _gAGROVOC _2 _91173 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aMonoculture _2AGROVOC _915339 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aCrop rotation _2AGROVOC _91807 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aSoil properties _2AGROVOC _91269 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aTillage _2AGROVOC _91832 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aNavarro–Noya, Y.E. _93733 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aLuna Guido, M. _9188 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aVerhulst, N. _gFormerly Sustainable Intensification Program _gFormerly Integrated Development Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3307 _9916 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCrossa, J. _gGenetic Resources Program _8CCJL01 _959 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aGovaerts, B. _gSustainable Intensification Program _gIntegrated Development Program _gDG's Office _8INT2813 _9860 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDendooven, L. _9470 |
|
773 | 0 |
_gv. 157, art. 103733 _dAmsterdam (Netherlands) : Elsevier, 2021. _x0929-1393 _tApplied Soil Ecology _wu56850 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/20935 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |