000 | 03164nab|a22003617a|4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c61165 _d61157 |
||
001 | 61165 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20240919020951.0 | ||
008 | 191208s2019||||sz |||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
022 | _a1664-462X | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01311 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMontesinos-Lopez, O.A. _8I1706800 _92700 _gGenetic Resources Program |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMulti-trait, multi-environment genomic prediction of durum wheat with genomic best linear unbiased predictor and deep learning methods |
260 |
_aSwitzerland : _bFrontiers, _c2019. |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aAlthough durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum Desf.) is a minor cereal crop representing just 5-7% of the world's total wheat crop, it is a staple food in Mediterranean countries, where it is used to produce pasta, couscous, bulgur and bread. In this paper, we cover multi-trait prediction of grain yield (GY), days to heading (DH) and plant height (PH) of 270 durum wheat lines that were evaluated in 43 environments (country-location-year combinations) across a broad range of water regimes in the Mediterranean Basin and other locations. Multi-trait prediction analyses were performed by implementing a multi-trait deep learning model (MTDL) with a feed-forward network topology and a rectified linear unit activation function with a grid search approach for the selection of hyper-parameters. The results of the multi-trait deep learning method were also compared with univariate predictions of the genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) method and the univariate counterpart of the multi-trait deep learning method (UDL). All models were implemented with and without the genotype x environment interaction term. We found that the best predictions were observed without the genotype x environment interaction term in the UDL and MTDL methods. However, under the GBLUP method, the best predictions were observed when the genotype x environment interaction term was taken into account. We also found that in general the best predictions were observed under the GBLUP model; however, the predictions of the MTDL were very similar to those of the GBLUP model. This result provides more evidence that the GBLUP model is a powerful approach for genomic prediction, but also that the deep learning method is a practical approach for predicting univariate and multivariate traits in the context of genomic selection. | ||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aHard wheat _2AGROVOC _91142 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aMarker-assisted selection _2AGROVOC _910737 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aAgronomic characters _gAGROVOC _2 _91008 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMontesinos-Lopez, A. _92702 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aTuberosa, R. _92806 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aMaccaferri, M. _92805 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSciara, G. _911000 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aAmmar, K. _8INT2585 _9844 _gGlobal Wheat Program |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCrossa, J. _gGenetic Resources Program _8CCJL01 _959 |
|
773 | 0 |
_gv. 10, art. 1311 _dSwitzerland : Frontiers, 2019. _x1664-462X _tFrontiers in Plant Science _wu56875 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/20598 |
|
942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |