000 03539naa a22003737a 4500
001 G90172
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240506224032.0
008 240506s2006 gw ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
090 _aCIS-5120
100 1 _aSayre, K.D.
_8CSAY01
_94612
_gSustainable Intensification Program
245 1 0 _aComparison of alternative conservation agriculture technologies for rainfed production in the highlands of central Mexico
260 _aKiel (Germany) :
_bInternational Soil Tillage Research Organisation,
_c2006.
340 _aComputer File|Printed
520 _aRainfed cropping predominates in the highlands of central Mexico, with varying average annual rainfall ranging geographically from 350 to 1000 mm. Most rainfall occurs during the 4-6 month summer season and is typified by erratic, heavy showers commonly followed by unpredictable dry periods. Dry, cool winter seasons, essentially without cropping unless irrigation is available, follow the rainy summer season. Maize (Zea mays L.) is the main crop followed by dry beans (Phaeolus vulgaris L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) among others. Most farmers are small-scale, near subsistence producers and almost all farmers use tillage, remove/burn crop residues and carry out extensive mono-cropping. These traditional cropping practices have led to unstable and unsustainable crop productivity with associated degradation of most soil physical, biological and chemical parameters. There has been negligible farmer adoption of Conservation Agriculture (CA) technologies, which entail marked tillage reduction, surface retention of adequate crop residues and diversified crop rotations. Adoption of CA technologies in other countries with similar rainfed production systems has led to reduced production costs and enhanced crop yield and yield stability largely owing to more efficient water use as well as reversals in chronic soil degradation. The findings reported here compare a range of alternative CA technologies involving different seeding systems (flat planting versus raised bed planting), tillage levels (conventional versus zero reduced/zero tillage), crop residue management options (full removal, full retention and partial retention) and different crop rotations on crop yield, yield stability and economic viability.
536 _aConservation Agriculture Program|Genetic Resources Program
546 _aText in English
594 _aINT2813|CSAY01|INT2602|I1705038
650 7 _aMaize
_2AGROVOC
_91173
650 7 _aWheat
_2AGROVOC
_91310
650 7 _aConventional tillage
_2AGROVOC
_98383
650 7 _aZero tillage
_2AGROVOC
_91753
650 7 _91064
_aCrop residues
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _926289
_aRaised beds
_2AGROVOC
700 1 _aGovaerts, B.
_gSustainable Intensification Program
_gIntegrated Development Program
_gDG's Office
_8INT2813
_9860
700 1 _aMartinez, A.
_921154
700 1 _9845
_aMezzalama, M.
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8INT2602
700 1 _aMartínez, M.
_927303
711 2 _933879
_aInternational Soil Tillage Research Organisation Triennial Conference
_n(17th :
_d28 August – 3 September, 2006 :
_cKiel, Germany)
773 0 _dKiel (Germany) : International Soil Tillage Research Organisation, 2006.
_gp. 1012-1018
_tInternational Soil Tillage Research Organisation, ISTRO; Triennial Conference: Sustainability - Its Impact on Soil Management and Environment 17; Kiel, Germany, 28 Aug - 5 Sep, 2006
942 _cCPA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c6108
_d6108