| 000 | 03146nab|a22004457a|4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c60608 _d60600 |
||
| 001 | 60608 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20240919020917.0 | ||
| 008 | 190701s2019||||xxk|||p|op||||00||0|eng|d | ||
| 022 | _a0365-0340 | ||
| 022 | _a1476-3567 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1566708 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 |
_aJat, H.S. _95697 |
|
| 245 | 1 | _aConservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of basmati rice-wheat system in North-West India | |
| 260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bTaylor and Francis, _c2019. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aContinuous mono-cropping of rice-wheat (RW) system with conventional tillage (CT) based management practices have led to decline in soil health, groundwater table and farmers profit in north-west India. A medium-term (4 years) farmer’s participatory strategic research trial of basmati RW system was conducted to evaluate the effects of conservation agriculture (CA) based management practices on crop yields, water productivity, profitability and soil quality. Six treatments were compared varied in the cropping system, tillage, crop establishment and residue management. CA-based management under zero-till direct seeded rice-wheat-mungbean recorded 36% higher system yield than conventional till rice-wheat system (14.91 Mg ha−1). CA-based rice-wheat system and rice-wheat-mungbean system saved ~35% irrigation water compared to conventional RW system (2168 mm ha−1). Total water productivity (WPI+R) was improved by 67% with CA-based rice-wheat-mungbean system (0.90 kg grain m−3) over the conventional system. On system basis, 42% higher net return was recorded with CA-based rice-wheat-mungbean system compared to conventional system (USD 2570 ha−1). Mungbean integration in basmati RW system contributed 29% share in system net returns across the treatments. Soil chemical and biological properties were improved by ~40% and 150%, respectively, with CA-based management system. | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aJat, H.S. : Not in IRS Staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 591 | _aSutaliya, J.M. : Not in IRS Staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 591 | _aSingh, Y. : Not in IRS Staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aProductivity _gAGROVOC _91756 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _98416 _aProfitability |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91064 _aCrop residues |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _93692 _aMung beans |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _92619 _aConservation agriculture |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91109 _aFarming systems |
|
| 651 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _93726 _aIndia |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aPardeep Kumar _99719 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSutaliya, J.M. _93727 |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aSatish Kumar _99718 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_95351 _aChoudhary, M. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSingh, Y. _9700 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aJat, M.L. _gFormerly Sustainable Intensification Program _gFormerly Sustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3072 _9889 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tArchives of Agronomy and Soil Science _gv. 65, no. 10, p. 1370-1386 _dUnited Kingdom : Taylor and Francis, 2019. _x0365-0340 _w94785 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_uhttp://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/download/cis/60608.pdf _yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _n0 _2ddc |
||