000 | 03201nab a22003977a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c60606 _d60598 |
||
001 | 60606 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20211006085158.0 | ||
008 | 190701s2019 xxu|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0011-183X | ||
022 | _a1435-0653 (Online) | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0722 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
100 | 1 |
_99687 _aMebratu, A. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aGenotype x environment interaction of quality protein maize hybrids under contrasting management condition in Eastern and Southern Africa |
260 |
_aMadison (USA) : _bCSSA, _c2019. |
||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
520 | _aDrought and low soil fertility are major abiotic stresses limiting yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in eastern and southern Africa. The present study was undertaken to determine genotype by environment interaction (GEI) and grain yield stability of quality protein maize (QPM) experimental hybrids. A total of 108 hybrids, including two commercial checks, were tested across 13 environments under drought, low N, and optimal environments in Ethiopia, Zambia, and Zimbabwe in 2015 and 2016. Environment, hybrid, and hybrid × environment interaction effects were significant (P < 0.01) across environments and within management conditions. The highest yielding hybrids were H40, H41, H56, and H58 under optimum management; H2, H9, H40, and H87 under low N; H3, H10, H11, and H94 under drought; and H9, H10, H40, H56, and H94 across environments. The GEI and grain yield stability analysis using different models indicated that additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI), and genotypic main effects plus GEI (GGE) models were more efficient and precise compared to the linear regression stability model in identifying high-yielding hybrids with stable performance. Based on the AMMI and GGE biplots, the most promising QPM hybrids were identified under different management conditions. Hybrid H40 was the most outstanding genotype under various management conditions and could be used in breeding programs or commercialized in target areas. Gwebi optimum and Bako low N were identified as the most discriminating and representative environments under the contrasting management conditions. In general, results of the present study depicted the possibility of developing high-yielding and stable QPM hybrids for stress and nonstress conditions. | ||
526 |
_aMCRP _bFP3 |
||
546 | _aText in English | ||
650 | 7 |
_aMaize _gAGROVOC _2 _91173 |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91133 _aGenotype environment interaction |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91151 _aHybrids |
|
650 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _91278 _aStress tolerance |
|
651 | 7 |
_2AGROVOC _94387 _aEast Africa |
|
651 | 7 |
_91954 _aSouthern Africa _gAGROVOC |
|
700 | 1 |
_9952 _aDagne Wegary Gissa _gGlobal Maize Program _8INT3401 |
|
700 | 1 |
_99688 _aMohammed, W. |
|
700 | 1 |
_8I1705938 _9791 _aChere, A.T. _gGlobal Maize Program |
|
700 | 1 |
_8INT2937 _9876 _aAmsal Tesfaye Tarekegne _gGlobal Maize Program |
|
773 | 0 |
_dMadison (USA) : CSSA, 2019. _gv. 59, no. 4, p. 1576-1589 _tCrop Science _wu444244 _x1435-0653 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/20212 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cJA _n0 |