000 02902nab a22003977a 4500
999 _c60381
_d60373
001 60381
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20211006073059.0
008 190430s2012 ne |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1876-4517
022 _a1876-4525 (Online)
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0184-1
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 1 _99196
_aBokusheva, R.
245 1 0 _aFactors determining the adoption and impact of a postharvest storage technology
260 _aNetherlands :
_bSpringer,
_c2012.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aThis paper evaluates the determinants and impact of adopting the metal silo—a postharvest storage technology for staple grains—which was disseminated by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) from 1983 to 2003 in four Central American countries. The aim of the SDC program was to diminish smallholder farmers’ postharvest losses by facilitating the manufacture and dissemination of metal silos and thereby to improve regional food security. Our empirical analysis is based on a unique data set obtained from a survey of 1,600 households from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. We employed a double-hurdle model to identify factors that contributed to the adoption of metal silos and used Tobit and standard regression models to assess the impact of adopting the silos on food security and well-being of households. Our results show that both the household demand for metal silos and the impact of their adoption varied across the four countries, demonstrating the relevance of regional policies for their adoption, as well as their impact. Furthermore, our results indicate that, in addition to achieving household self-sufficiency in maize, the main determinants of adoption were household socio-economic characteristics such as age, land ownership, completion of a training course and quality of basic infrastructure. Finally, when considering a group of economic and social indicators of household well-being, we found that, compared to the silo non-adopters, the adopter households experienced a significant improvement in their food security and well-being between 2005 and 2009.
546 _aText in English
650 7 _aFood security
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91118
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_96638
_aStorage
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_98668
_aImpact assessment
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_96347
_aPostharvest losses
651 7 _95541
_aCentral America
700 1 _99197
_aFinger, R.
700 1 _99198
_aFischler, M.
700 1 _99199
_aBerlin, R.
700 1 _99200
_aMarin, Y.
700 1 _99201
_aPerez, F.
700 1 _99202
_aPaiz, F.
773 0 _dNetherlands : Springer, 2012.
_gv. 4, n. 2, p. 279-293
_tFood Security
_wu93816
_x1876-4517
856 4 _yClick here to access online
_uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12571-012-0184-1
942 _2ddc
_cJA
_n0