000 03519nab a22004577a 4500
999 _c59033
_d59025
001 59033
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240919020949.0
008 180111s2017 sz |||p|sp||| 00| 0 eng d
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01916
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 0 _95943
_aAo Zhang
245 1 _aEffect of trait heritability, training population size and marker density on genomic prediction accuracy estimation in 22 bi-parental tropical maize populations
_h[Electronic Resource]
260 _aSwitzerland :
_bFrontiers,
_c2017.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aGenomic selection is being used increasingly in plant breeding to accelerate genetic gain per unit time. One of the most important applications of genomic selection in maize breeding is to predict and select the best un-phenotyped lines in bi-parental populations based on genomic estimated breeding values. In the present study, 22 bi-parental tropical maize populations genotyped with low density SNPs were used to evaluate the genomic prediction accuracy (rMG) of the six trait-environment combinations under various levels of training population size (TPS) and marker density (MD), and assess the effect of trait heritability (h2), TPS and MD on rMG estimation. Our results showed that: (1) moderate rMG values were obtained for different trait-environment combinations, when 50% of the total genotypes was used as training population and ~200 SNPs were used for prediction; (2) rMG increased with an increase in h2, TPS and MD, both correlation and variance analyses showed that h2 is the most important factor and MD is the least important factor on rMG estimation for most of the trait-environment combinations; (3) predictions between pairwise half-sib populations showed that the rMG values for all the six trait-environment combinations were centered around zero, 49% predictions had rMG values above zero; (4) the trend observed in rMG differed with the trend observed in rMG/h, and h is the square root of heritability of the predicted trait, it indicated that both rMG and rMG/h values should be presented in GS study to show the accuracy of genomic selection and the relative accuracy of genomic selection compared with phenotypic selection, respectively. This study provides useful information to maize breeders to design genomic selection workflow in their breeding programs.
526 _aMCRP
_bFP2
_bFP3
546 _aText in English
650 7 _91132
_aGenomics
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _aMaize
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91173
650 7 _aBreeding methods
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91030
700 _94567
_aHongwu Wang
700 1 _9870
_aBeyene, Y.
_gGlobal Maize Program
_8INT2891
700 1 _9869
_aFentaye Kassa Semagn
_8INT2869
_gGlobal Maize Program
700 0 _95999
_aYubo Liu
700 0 _95938
_aShiliang Cao
700 0 _96000
_aZhenhai Cui
700 0 _96001
_aYanye Ruan
700 1 _9907
_aBurgueƱo, J.
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8INT3239
700 1 _9884
_aSan Vicente, F.M.
_8INT3035
_gGlobal Maize Program
700 1 _9923
_aOlsen, M.
_gGlobal Maize Program
_8INT3333
700 1 _aPrasanna, B.M.
_gGlobal Maize Program
_8INT3057
_9887
700 1 _aCrossa, J.
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8CCJL01
_959
700 0 _96002
_aHaiqiu Yu
700 0 _aXuecai Zhang
_gGlobal Maize Program
_8INT3400
_9951
773 0 _gv. 8:1916
_tFrontiers in Plant Science
_wu56875
856 4 _yOpen Access through DSpace
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/19131
942 _2ddc
_cJA
_n0