| 000 | 02824nab a22003377a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c58509 _d58501 |
||
| 001 | 58509 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20230815161011.0 | ||
| 008 | 151215b2017 uk |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000193 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_94600 _aAlemayehu, A. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aMaize–common bean intercropping to optimize maize-based crop production |
| 260 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bCambridge University Press, _c2017. |
||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 520 | _aMaize (Zea mays L.)–common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping is a recent practice in north-western Ethiopia and there is limited information on its productivity. A field experiment was conducted at South Achefer and Mecha in north-western Ethiopia during the 2012 and 2013 crop growing seasons to determine combinations of intercrop planting arrangement (IPA) with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) rates for optimizing maize–common bean intercrop productivity and profitability. Treatments consisted of factorial combinations of two IPA (single row of common bean between maize rows and paired rows of common bean between paired rows of maize), two N rates (92 and 128 kg N/ha) and two P rates (20 and 40 kg P/ha). A sole crop maize with recommended fertilizer rate of 128/40 kg N/P/ha was used as a control treatment. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results indicated that land equivalent ratio wasmore than unity, and the intercrop system was 20% more productive relative to the sole crop. Maize equivalent yields were highest for most of the intercrop treatments relative to mono-crop maize with yield advantage of 14% from single row IPA with 128/20 kg N/P/ha. Single row IPA with 128/20 kg N/P/ha and paired row IPA with 92/20 kg N/P/ha increased financial returns by 16 and 8% relative to sole crop maize, respectively. Smallholder maize-based cropping of north-western Ethiopia could be nutritionally, agronomically and financially improved through maize–common bean intercropping of single row IPA with appropriate nutrient management. | ||
| 526 |
_aMCRP _bFP1 |
||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aMaize _gAGROVOC _2 _91173 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_94601 _aKidney beans _2AGROVOC |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_91212 _aPlant production _2AGROVOC |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_94602 _aTamado, T. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_94603 _aNigussie, D. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_94604 _aYigzaw, D. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aFantaye, K.T. _gSocioeconomics Program _gSustainable Agrifood Systems _8INT3458 _9956 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_91830 _aWortmann, C.S. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_wu444500 _x0021-8596 _dUnited Kingdom : Cambridge University Press _tJournal of Agricultural Science _gv. 155, p. 1124-1136 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff _uhttp://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/Download/cis/58509.pdf |
|
| 942 |
_2ddc _cJA _n0 |
||