000 03048nab a22003617a 4500
999 _c57178
_d57170
001 57178
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20201211174809.0
008 151214s2016 xxu|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0635-5
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
100 1 _9789
_aAddis Teshome Kebede
_gGlobal Maize Program
_8I1705926
245 1 0 _aHousehold-level determinants of soil and water conservation adoption phases :
_bevidence from North-Western Ethiopian Highlands
260 _aUSA:
_bSpringer,
_c2016.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aOpen Access
520 _aSoil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been promoted in the highlands of Ethiopia during the last four decades. However, the level of adoption of SWC practices varies greatly. This paper examines the drivers of different stages of adoption of SWC technologies in the north-western highlands of Ethiopia. This study is based on a detailed farm survey among 298 households in three watersheds. Simple descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the stages of adoption. An ordered probit model was used to analyze the drivers of different stages of adoption of SWC. This model is used to analyze more than two outcomes of an ordinal dependent variable. The results indicate that sampled households are found in different phases of adoption, i.e., dis-adoption/non-adoption (18.5 %), initial adoption (30.5 %), actual adoption (20.1 %), and final adoption (30.9 %). The results of the ordered probit model show that some socio-economic and institutional factors affect the adoption phases of SWC differently. Farm labor, parcel size, ownership of tools, training in SWC, presence of SWC program, social capital (e.g., cooperation with adjacent farm owners), labor sharing scheme, and perception of erosion problem have a significant positive influence on actual and final adoption phases of SWC. In addition, the final adoption phase of SWC is positively associated with tenure security, cultivated land sizes, parcel slope, and perception on SWC profitability. Policy makers should take into consideration factors affecting (continued) adoption of SWC such as profitability, tenure security, social capital, technical support, and resource endowments (e.g., tools and labor) when designing and implementing SWC policies and programs.
526 _aMCRP
_bFP1
526 _aWC
_cFP1
536 _aGlobal Maize Program
536 _aSocioeconomics Program
591 _bCIMMYT Informa No. 1960
594 _aI1705926
594 _aINT3096
650 7 _92273
_aSoil conservation
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _92274
_aWater conservation
_2AGROVOC
651 7 _97944
_aEthiopian
_2AGROVOC
_xRegion
700 1 _92275
_aGraaff, J.
700 1 _9890
_aKassie, M.
_gSocioeconomics Program
_8INT3096
773 0 _wu96713
_x1432-1009 (Revista en electrónico)
_dSpringer -Verlag KG Heidelberg, 1977
_tEnvironmental Management
_gv. 57, no. 3, p. 620-636
856 4 _yOpen Access through DSpace
_uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10883/16836
942 _2ddc
_cJA
_n0