000 | 02743nab a22004217a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c57149 _d57141 |
||
001 | 57149 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
005 | 20240919021225.0 | ||
008 | 151130s2015 n |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2015.05.001 | |
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
100 | 0 |
_92189 _aPunam S. Yadav |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aEnhanced resistance in wheat against stem rust achieved by marker assisted backcrossing involving three independent Sr genes |
260 |
_aAmsterdam : _bElsevier, _c2015. |
||
500 | _aOpen Access | ||
500 | _aPeer review | ||
520 | _aMarker assisted backcrossing (MABC) was used to transfer the three stem rust (Puccinia graminis tritici)resistant genes Sr25, SrWeb and Sr50 into the popular Indian wheat cv. HUW234. The donor was theCIMMYT breeding line PMBWIR4, and each of the target genes was marked by a simple PCR assay. Athree step screening strategy was adopted: the first screen comprised foreground selection, the secondused markers lying close to the introgression borders to reduce the extent of linkage drag, and the last wasbackground selection based on 149 informative microsatellite assays. Based on the background selectionoutcomes, at the BC1F1generation the proportion of the genome fixed for cv. HUW234 alleles rangedfrom 55% to 67%. Three BC1F1individuals were crossed a second time with cv. HUW234, resulting inthe identification of six BC2F3families carrying all three target Sr genes; the proportion of their genomeinherited from cv. HUW234 ranged from 86% to 92%. BC2F4and BC2F5material was planted at threedifferent locations under both disease-free and artificially induced epiphytotic conditions. Compared torecurrent parent, the improved versions of cv. HUW234 displayed significantly superior resistance tostem rust, and their agronomic performance was as good as, or even marginally better than that of thesource cultivar. | ||
536 | _aGlobal Wheat Program | ||
546 | _aText in english | ||
591 | _bCIMMYT Informa No. 1960 | ||
594 | _aINT2917 | ||
650 | 7 |
_aRusts _gAGROVOC _2 _91251 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPlant breeding _gAGROVOC _2 _91203 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aDisease resistance _gAGROVOC _2 _91077 |
|
650 | 7 |
_93444 _aMolecular genetics _2AGROVOC |
|
700 | 0 |
_91734 _aVinod Kumar Mishra |
|
700 | 1 |
_91876 _aArun, B. |
|
700 | 0 |
_aRamesh Chand _91735 |
|
700 | 1 |
_92190 _aVishwakarma, M.K. |
|
700 | 1 |
_92191 _aVasistha, N.K. |
|
700 | 1 |
_92192 _aMishra, A.N. |
|
700 | 1 |
_91874 _aKalappanavar, I.K. |
|
700 | 1 |
_9873 _aJoshi, A.K. _gGlobal Wheat Program _8INT2917 |
|
773 | 0 |
_w57148 _x2214-6628 _dAmsterdam : Elsevier _tCurrent plant biology _gv. 2, p. 25-33 |
|
856 | 4 |
_yOpen Access through DSpace _uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10883/16817 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cJA _n0 |