000			02913nam a22003497a 4500
001			G82916
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20250623100104.0
008			250623s2003||||mx ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aspa
090			_aLook under author name
100	1		_aDe La Cruz Lazaro, E.
245	1	0	_aAptitud combinatoria de lineas de maiz QPM para caracteristicas forrajeras
246	0	0	_aAptitud combinatoria de lineas de maiz QPM para caracteristicas forrajeras
260			_aSaltillo, Coahuila (Mexico) : _bUniversidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, _c2003
300			_axii, 58 pages
500			_aThesis (Ph. D.)
520			_aThe main objectives of this study were; (i) to know the general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) of eight QPM maize inbred lines for CIMMYT maize program; (ii) to identify the best hybrids. The Griffing method IV was used to get all possible direct crosses (28) among the eight inbred lines. Crosses were evaluated at the "Ampuero Ranch" of Torreón, Coahuila, México, during 2001 and 2002. In both years a complete randomized blocks experimental design with two replications was used. Plant density was 80,000 plants ha-1 Agronomic characteristics such as plant height (PH), green forage yield (GFY), dry matter yield (DMY) and ear percentage (EP) were measured. Forage quality characteristics such as dry matter intake (DMI), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), lactation net energy (LNE) and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVD) were also measured. Results showed significant variation (P ≤0.01) between the crosses (genotypes) for the evaluated agronomic and chemical traits, with exception of IVD, all crosses agronomic and chemical characteristics showed significant variability. PH, GFY, DMY, DMI and CP showed GCA highly significant statistical differences among inbred lines. With the exception of IVD, all the other forage quality characteristics showed significant SCA effects. Mean squares analysis showed additive effects were more important for GFY, DMY, DMI and LNE, and no additive effects were greater than the additives in characteristics such as PH, EP, CP, ADF and NDF. Line 3 PH and CP, line 7 GFY, DMI and LNE; line 1 EP and NDF, line 4 DMY and line 2 IVD showed the highest GCA. Crosses 2x5, 4x5, 5x7 and 7x8 showed the best GFY and DMY but EP was low. The forage quality of these characteristics was inconsistent.
546			_aSpanish
591			_a0601
595			_aTC
650		7	_aZea mays _2AGROVOC _91314
650		7	_aCombining ability _2AGROVOC _92367
650		7	_aInbred lines _2AGROVOC _91155
650		7	_aDiallel analysis _2AGROVOC _94687
650		7	_aCross-breeding _2AGROVOC _926603
650		7	_aForage _2AGROVOC _92361
650		7	_aQuality _2AGROVOC _91231
650		7	_aProtein quality _2AGROVOC _91223
942			_cTH _2ddc
999			_c46153 _d46153