| 000 | 01718nam a22003617a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G66405 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20211006080737.0 | ||
| 008 | 121211s ||||f| 0 p|p||0|| | | ||
| 020 | _a968-6923-94-2 | ||
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 072 | 0 | _aH20 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a632.4 _bDUB |
| 100 | 1 |
_aMesterhazy, A. _uFusarium Head Scab: Global Status and Future Prospects; Proceedings of a Workshop; El Batan, Mexico; 13-17 Oct 1996 |
|
| 110 | 2 | _aCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo (CIMMYT), Mexico DF (Mexico) | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aFungicide control of fusarium scab and impact on toxin contamination |
| 260 |
_aMexico, DF (Mexico) _bCIMMYT : _c1997 |
||
| 340 | _aPrinted | ||
| 520 | _aThe control of fusarium head blight (FHB) is an unsolved problem worldwide. Tests have shown that large differences exist between the efficacies of fungicides used for FHB control. Fungicides control not only symptom development, but also toxin contamination of grain produced. Highly susceptible genotypes cannot be fully protected under severe epidemic conditions. To achieve effective control, the most susceptible cultivars should be withdrawn from commercial production, and fungicides applied as a preventive measure. Current results show that tebuconazole achieves the most effective control. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 591 | _a9806|AGRIS 9802 | ||
| 593 | _aJose Juan Caballero | ||
| 595 | _aCPC | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aChemical control _91039 |
| 650 | 1 | 7 |
_aFungi _gAGROVOC _2 _91121 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aFungicides |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aFusarium _92705 |
| 650 | 1 | 7 |
_aPlant diseases _gAGROVOC _2 _91206 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aToxins |
| 653 | 0 | _aCIMMYT | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aDubin, H.J.|Gilchrist, L.|Reeves, J.|McNab, A. _eeds. |
|
| 942 | _cPRO | ||
| 999 |
_c3886 _d3886 |
||