| 000 | 02851nab a22004097a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G99686 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20211006074520.0 | ||
| 008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
| 022 | 0 | _a0959-3780 | |
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.002 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aEn | |
| 100 | 1 | _aLee, D.R. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDeveloping local adaptation strategies for climate change in agriculture: _b a priority-setting approach with application to Latin America |
| 260 | _c2014 | ||
| 500 | _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes | http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0959-3780 | ||
| 520 | _aEven with substantially increased attention to climate adaptation in developing countries in recent years, there are a number of important remaining research needs: better incorporating stakeholder input; using replicable methodologies to provide comparability across different settings; assuring that stakeholder input reflects the results of climate science, not simply perceptions; and effectively linking stakeholder input with the regional and national levels at which policy changes are made. This study reports the results of a methodology for identifying and prioritizing local, stakeholder-driven response options to climate change in agriculture. The approach is based on multi-criteria scoring methods previously applied to research planning and priority-setting in agricultural and natural resource management research, public health, and other areas. The methodology is a sequential approach built around needs assessments by local stakeholders; the incorporation of climate science results; the sharing of these results and climate adaption response options with stakeholders at a series of workshops; stakeholder priority-setting exercises using multi-criteria scoring; and validation with policymakers. The application is to three diverse agroecosystems in Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. Among the many findings is that, notwithstanding the wide diversity of agro-ecosystems, there are numerous similarities in the agricultural adaptation responses prioritized by local stakeholders. | ||
| 536 | _aConservation Agriculture Program | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 591 | _aCIMMYT Informa 2015|Elsevier | ||
| 593 | _aCarelia Juarez | ||
| 594 | _aINT3034 | ||
| 595 | _aCSC | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aAdaptation |
| 650 | 1 | 7 |
_aAgriculture _gAGROVOC _2 _91007 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aLatin America |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aPriority-setting |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aRural stakeholders |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_91045 _aClimate change _gAGROVOC |
| 700 | 1 |
_aDe Nys, E., _ecoaut. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aEdmeades, S., _ecoaut. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aJanssen, W., _ecoaut. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_9883 _aMcDonald, A. _gSustainable Intensification Program _8INT3034 _ecoaut. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tGlobal Environmental Change _gv. 29, p. 78-91 |
|
| 942 | _cJA | ||
| 999 |
_c30933 _d30933 |
||