| 000 | 02224nab a22003137a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G96430 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/10438590600692926 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aEn | |
| 043 | _aUS | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aShankar, B. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aOutput risk aspects of genetically modified crop technology in South Africa |
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 520 | _aTechnology involving genetic modification of crops has the potential to make a contribution to rural poverty reduction in many developing countries. Thus far, insecticide-producing ?Bt? varieties of cotton have been the main GM crops under cultivation in developing nations. Several studies have evaluated the farm-level performance of Bt varieties in comparison to conventional ones by estimating production technology, and have mostly found Bt technology to be very successful in raising output and/or reducing insecticide input. However, the production risk properties of this technology have not been studied, although they are likely to be important to risk-averse smallholders. This study investigates the output risk aspects of Bt technology using a three-year farm-level dataset on smallholder cotton production in Makhathini flats, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa. Stochastic dominance and stochastic production function estimation methods are used to examine the risk properties of the two technologies. Results indicate that Bt technology increases output risk by being most effective when crop growth conditions are good, but being less effective when conditions are less favourable. However, in spite of its risk increasing effect, the mean output performance of Bt cotton is good enough to make it preferable to conventional technology even for risk-averse smallholders. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 593 | _aCarelia Juarez | ||
| 595 | _aRPC | ||
| 653 | 0 | _aBt cotton | |
| 653 | 0 | _aGenetically modified crops | |
| 653 | 0 | _aGM technology | |
| 653 | 0 | _aRisk and uncertainty | |
| 653 | 0 | _aStochastic dominance | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aBennett, R., _ecoaut. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aMorse, S., _ecoaut. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tEconomics of Innovation and New Technology _gv. 16, no. 4, p. 277-291 |
|
| 942 | _cJA | ||
| 999 |
_c29074 _d29074 |
||