000 03056nab a22003977a 4500
001 G95078
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240919020946.0
008 210805t2011 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1475-2735 (Online)
022 0 _a0960-2585
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258511000055
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
090 _aCIS-6348
100 1 _aMontesinos-Lopez, O.A.
_8I1706800
_92700
_gGenetic Resources Program
245 1 0 _aOptimal sample size for estimating the proportion of transgenic plants using the Dorfman model with a random confidence interval
260 _aCambridge (United Kingdom) :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2011.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0960-2585
520 _aGroup testing is a procedure in which groups that contain several units (plants) are analysed without having to inspect individual plants, with the purpose of estimating the prevalence of genetically modified plants (adventitious presence of unwanted transgenic plants, AP) in a population at a low cost, without losing precision. When pool (group) testing is used to estimate the proportion of AP (p), there are several procedures that can be used for computing the confidence interval (CI); however, they usually do not ensure precision in the estimation of p. This research proposes a formula for determining the required number of pools (g), given a pool size (k), for estimating the proportion of AP plants using the Dorfman model. The proposed formula ensures precision in the estimated proportion of AP because it guarantees that the width (W) of the CI will be equal to, or narrower than, the desired width (v), with a probability of g. This probability accounts for the stochastic nature of the sample variance of p. We give examples to show how to use the proposed sample size formula. Simulated data were created and tables are presented showing the different scenarios that a researcher may encounter. The Monte Carlo method was used to study the coverage and the level of assurance achieved by the proposed sample sizes. An R program that reproduces the results in the tables and makes it easy for the researcher to create other scenarios is given in the Appendix.
536 _aGenetic Resources Program
546 _aText in English
591 _aCambridge University Press
594 _aCCJL01
650 7 _aTransgenic plants
_2AGROVOC
_94329
650 7 _aStatistical methods
_2AGROVOC
_92624
650 7 _aSampling
_2AGROVOC
_96084
700 1 _92702
_aMontesinos-Lopez, A.
700 1 _aCrossa, J.
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8CCJL01
_959
700 1 _92704
_aEskridge, K.
700 1 _921897
_aSáenz, R.A.
773 0 _tSeed Science Research
_gv. 21, no. 3, p. 235-245
_dCambridge (United Kingdom) : Cambridge University Press, 2011.
_wG96711
_x0960-2585
856 4 _yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/264
942 _cJA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c28398
_d28398